intained anymore.
The move from kudzu over udev to hal and via DeviceKit back to (lib)udev
wasn't something I wanted to follow while it was still moving ;-). In
the hope that using libudev is here to stay, I can now reimplement
hwbrowser on top of it -- I don't think porting the old code
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:11 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> nphilipp:
> rss-glx
> /usr/bin/rss-glx-rss-glx_install.pl
This file isn't needed on Fedora, I've built 0.9.0-3 without it.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> nphilipp:BADURL:python-slip-0.1.15.tar.bz2:python-slip
Thanks for the heads up. I've moved the package and all the tarballs
from fedorapeople to fedorahosted and the URL has been changed
accordingly in the current packages.
Nils
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:58 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> >
> > As it is, malware need only sit in the background and wait for e.g. a
> > PolicyKit-enabled user manager to acquire the authorization for user
all a backdoor account.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2
l "involved" src
packages, get pushed simultaneously, i.e. put the all in one update
request in bodhi).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com
data--crc error
DEBUG util.py:256: tar: Child returned status 1
DEBUG util.py:256: tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 2
DEBUG util.py:78: remove tree:
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-sane-frontends-1.0.14-6.fc11.src.rpm
DEBUG uti
rward as it sounds. Thankfully,
I'll soon be able to devote more time to OS things than in the past.
Frontend-wise I'm rather missing tools for sensible batch-processing
(we've about 2000 slides that are waiting to be digitized) than
something "simple" like gnome-scan, but IMO
.
> Wrong. It doesn't.
I don't think we have the power to (nor would we want to) force upstream
to do certain things in a certain way, for ridiculously low prices and
"no we won't pay you on delivery" but 3 months later. The relationship
between us and upstream is significa
idea, though. If there
is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
n...@redhat.com nor Safety.&q
10 matches
Mail list logo