that rawhide summary (built later),
but there was no change affecting this, so the file is present in
coreutils-7.5-2.fc12 (I checked package built in koji) which should be
relevant for this rawhide report... Really looks like some glitch
somewhere...
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je
includes a symlink via %doc.
>
Sorry for that, already solved by coreutils-7.5-2.fc12, now built in
koji (and it should be already propagated in build repos as it is part
of latest root.log in tasks)
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsan
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:35AM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this
> > > Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features:
> > &g
event (at least some) later SIGABRTs.
Should the bugzilla with request for change be filled?
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
'm generally +1 for changing the default that way - as it would not
change anything for users without that directory.
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> >>> Owen Taylor wrote:
> >>>> I was rather surprised to see:
> >>>>
> >>>>
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:02 +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > I was rather surprised to see:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.
automake/autoconf.
Therefore I don't expect incompatibility issues.
Anyone experienced troubles with latest automake in rawhide (other than
exact automake version check)? If so - it's still in testing, so it
still could (and for F-9 imho anyway should) be unpushed...
Greetings,
On
st way to
resolve those multilib conflicts would be to have pl-libs subpackage.
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
awhide, so it should be fixed
there...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483548
Greetings,
Ondřej Vašík
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 04/28/2009 03:04 AM, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > What's the best way to handle that situation? One possibility is to
> > increase the threshold of system level id's (to 200? 300?)
>
> I guess I've been blissfully ignorant and always
11 matches
Mail list logo