> libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717
>
> I just got the driver for these cards merged into the linux kernel
> staging tree a few days ago. Now we need the device interface library to
> talk to the thing and add support to
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 of January 2010 17:24:46 Chris Weyl wrote:
>> Well, it's post-holiday season now and I'm starting to catch up on my
>> mail/bugs... These should be taken care of this week. Feel free to
>> ping me via email/bugzilla if you need a
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > > I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
>> > > > review at
>> > > >
>> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
>> > > >
>> > > > Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala.
>> > > > Deja-dup
>> > > > like
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:37 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> On 12/21/2009 12:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:18 -0800,
>> John Poelstra wrote:
>>>
>>> Great idea. I need someone from the Spins SIG to tell me what those
>>> dates are. It would also be really help
Hi,
> I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
> review at
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
>
> Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
> like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
> "source
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sometime today or tomorrow I'll be uploading Mono-2.6 and the final
> release of MD-2.2 with all the fun that it will bring. There are lots of
> changes under the hood of mono and while the likes of gtk-sharp2 et al
> are still working on my t
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:17 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> One of the complaints heard during the last release cycle was that some
> maintainers where unclear what all the schedule milestones meant.
>
> Before we reach any of these milestones for Fedora 13 I wanted to send this
> out for feedback.
> sugar-base-0.86.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
> sugar-datastore-0.86.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
> sugar-toolkit-0.86.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
I've fixed these 3 up.
Cheers,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hi All,
Anyone interested in swapping a couple of package reviews?
mx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465
moblin-app-installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301
Regards,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/
Hi Jesse,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:25 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> What's the status of the issues with the rawhide compose?
>
> All the broken deps preventing a compose attempt have been cleared out.
>
Hi All,
What's the status of the issues with the rawhide compose? Are they
going to be fixed and a push done before the upcoming extended outage?
What about outstanding tag build-override requests?
Cheers,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.c
> What this means for you (for very specific values of you):
>
> If you own any of the following packages, you have upstart job files that
> will need modified for any needed format changes, and the new location.
>
> * olpc-utils pbrobinson
>
> We're willing to do the legwork for you, or
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 11/20/2009 09:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> 2009/11/18 Martin Stransky:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> a new firefox (3.6 beta 2) just hit rawhide (a.k.a f13). There are some
>>> c
On 11/27/09, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 21:24 +0100, stefan riemens wrote:
>> Not that i'm unhappy about the way things are going forward (my intel
>> gfx are working great!), but gnome 3 isn't going to be much useful
>> without 3d support...
>
> Note that gnome-shell working w
On 11/26/09, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 11/26/2009 04:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:08:27PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>>> As you obviously know tracking down and reporting bugs like these do take
>>> a lot of time and effort, quite often more than actually fixing them. At
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/20/2009 11:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>>> IMO, they are targetting MID devices, competing with Android, Smart
>>> phones
>>> and similar.
>>
>> Not at the moment they're not
>> On 11/20/2009 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
"Users of the Fedora Moblin Spin would have a much better user
experience on their NetBook, NetTop and other small devices"
>>>
>>> That's what the marketing department wants it to be.
>>
>> Meh. You said the target of the spin is not
>>> You must not confuse moblin with netbooks, nettops or with i386/32bit
>>> machines in general. The moblin desktop is addressing a completely
>>> different audience.
>>>
>>
>> Oh? That's not what I got from
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin
>
> It's what I get from this web
2009/11/18 Martin Stransky :
> Hi,
>
> a new firefox (3.6 beta 2) just hit rawhide (a.k.a f13). There are some
> changes which affect everyone who builds with xulrunner-devel-unstable
> package.
>
> Mozilla decided to merge all include directories to one (mozbz#398573) and
> stop shipping stable/un
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
>>> stan
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Hi folks,
> After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
> standing libsndfile bugs.
>
> One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
> libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
> broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were
> broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing
> ppc/ppc64 as a primary
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm creating an EFI bootable USB image on my rawhide system with this
> command-line:
>
> ./livecd-iso-to-disk.sh --format --efi --overlay-size-mb 400 \
> --delete-home --extra-kernel-args selinux=0 ./soas04.iso /dev/sd
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hopefully Nouveau gets 3D support within a couple of releases as well.
>
> Ben says to send beer. :)
Happily, ask him what slab he wants and where he wants it delivered :-P
Pet
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:41 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 18:01 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 18:01 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin remix
>> [1] for those that are interesting in playing. It would be
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Tim Lauridsen
wrote:
> On 11/07/2009 11:13 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>>
>> On 11/05/2009 07:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin
> | source rpm: clutter-cairo-0.8.2-3.fc11.src.rpm
> | package: clutter-cairo-devel-0.8.2-3.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386
> | unresolved deps:
> | libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0
> | clutter-cairo = 0:0.8.2-3.fc11
> | related pkgs:
> | clutter-cairo
> | clutter
>
> No "clutter-cairo" anym
2009/11/7 Jarosław Górny :
> Hi,
> CVS branches for my first package were created couple of days ago.
> Today I've set up my account (I think correctly), did a successful checkout,
> but I can't import sources:
>
>
> [jaros...@moonstone mpdscribble]$ ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-11 -m "Initial
> im
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Moblin is afaik Intel processors only. Would this work because of the
> fedora fundament on other processors like a via with 733mhz, too?
Intel's version of Moblin is optimised for Intel processors only.
Fedora's version of
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Guido Grazioli
wrote:
> 2009/11/5 Peter Robinson :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin remix
>> [1] for those that are interesting in playing. It would be nice to
>> have some
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> New mesa (7.6.0) is causing trouble for people using F-11/12 code (see
> bugs #524338 and #509528 for instance).
I've seen a couple of bugs in the 3D stuff with Moblin/clutter as
well. RHBZ #521714 and #529372 come to mind.
Peter
--
fedora
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Are the nightly composes (such as this:
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a
> build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide?
I believe F-12 and rawhide are still one and the same. F-13 rawhide
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
>> 5) How many untagged packages are there?
>>
>> koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
>
> I ran this today (just for kicks). It gives back 323 packages. Even with
> fals
Hi All,
> * Moblin graphical interface for netbooks - The Moblin graphical
> interface and applications are fully integrated thanks to Peter
> Robinson, a Fedora Project volunteer, and others. To use it, just
> install the Moblin Desktop Environment package group using yum or the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 11:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgr
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> >>>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
>>> experience and issues for F-12.
>>>
>>> P
>> As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
>> reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
>> experience and issues for F-12.
>>
>> Probably the two usual things that people query are grahics and wifi.
>> The model I have has the Intel IWL-4965AGN dev
Hi All,
As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt
reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade
experience and issues for F-12.
Probably the two usual things that people query are grahics and wifi.
The model I have has the Intel IWL-4965AGN device whic
Hi All,
I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone
but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are
the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that
weren't rebuilt for some reason or something that I've just missed?
Peter
--
fedora-
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> Because it allows me to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed
>> communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be
>> that it would be c
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12
>> Moblin remix spin
>
> You can add custom repositories to spin config files, s
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer
>> wrote:
>> > If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
&g
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:51:28 am Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
>> due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non c
Hi All,
I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is
due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or
critical path packages can't be tagged in. I have a number of Moblin
packages that fix various issues, in particular a rebuild of
network-manager-netbook to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Rawhide Report wrote:
>>> Removed package python-json
>>
>> Why was this removed? sugar-toolkit requires this package and now has broken
>&
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Removed package python-json
>
> Why was this removed? sugar-toolkit requires this package and now has broken
> dependencies!
Apparently the functionality has been merged into the main python
package. Looking at the cv
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
>> > This is going to be pretty important for scientific workloads where
>> > atlas is going to be used. I've eavesdropped on several conversations
>> > where people were talking about being able
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
>> the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be
>> essentially a Spin of stock Fedora. It also helps OLPC
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2009/10/6 Peter Robinson :
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>>> yum list all |grep olpc
>>> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12
>>&
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> yum list all |grep olpc
> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
> olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12 rawhide
> olpc-library.noarch 2.0.2-2.fc12
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200:
>>> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution
>>
>> I would like to maintain this package then.
>
> Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership.
I'll qu
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 03/10/2009 17:54, Peter Robinson a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The last day or so I've been getting the following error when doing a
>> 'make build' on the F-12 branches of various packages. Is the
Hi All,
The last day or so I've been getting the following error when doing a
'make build' on the F-12 branches of various packages. Is there a
reason for the branch being locked?
Peter
Usage: koji build [options] target URL
(Specify the --help global option for a list of other help options)
ko
2009/10/3 Christoph Höger :
> Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson:
>> > syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution
>>
>> I'll take this one.
>>
>> Peter
>
>
> I've just commented on that package, but you're
> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution
I'll take this one.
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>> And Today I am %100 finished... Please point out which part of that
>> did I misinterpret, because the last thing I want to do is cause problems...
>>
>
> Because we do seem to fight this problem every release. Was anyone else
> confused about when the deadline was? It seems very clear to me,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 01:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>>> I admit I'm not following sugar and numpy discussions too closely so I
>>> might have miss
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 12:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> the sugar-pippy rpm in Fedora depends on pygame, which is used by some
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Tue, 29-09-2009 a las 16:25 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz escribió:
>> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> > 1) are there lighter-weight alternatives for the most popular uses of
>> > numpy?
>>
>> No. It has no competition, and is used by virtual
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Tue, 29-09-2009 a las 12:36 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
>> pygame and numpy are parts of Sugar Platform[1], at least for 0.84,
>> so, the right question is should these pakcages be a part of SP-0.86
>> I guess +1 for both, since we hav
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the sugar-pippy rpm in Fedora depends on pygame, which is used by some
> of the examples.
>
> So far, so good, but pygame in turn depends on numpy, a 7.7MB package
> which a lot of huge dependencies such as atlas (11MB), libgfor
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 23:00 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
>> What do we have to do in order to build on PPC? Does it happen
>> automagically?
>
> Once the ppc builders are setup and running smoothly, successful build
> requests on the primary arch
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> > 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
>>
>> > >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
>> > >> guess
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:37:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> This was discussed a couple of days ago against another rawhide
>> report. I would check out the list archives for the reasoning.
>
> I fail to find it
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hiyas,
>
> why are the new packages now hidden below the broken dependencies? Iirc
> there was even a discussion about changing the format more than a year
> ago and back then it was decided to keep it as it is.
This was discussed a couple of
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need this package reviewed so that I can fix the broken dep on
> xsupplicant in rawhide:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017
>
> I'd be happy to do a review trade, just let me know.
Will do that for you
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mani A wrote:
> http://puredata.info/
>
> is not in the package database.
>
> >From the license POV, there are no problems.
I think this is the bug your after. A review is in progress but
there's a few build issues.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48856
Hi All,
I have a little touch screen device that I'm playing around with. It
has EFI and its easy enough to get it to boot something other than
what its meant to. It seems the LiveCD doesn't have EFI support there.
Any hints welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:58 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Broken deps for i386
>> > --
>> > anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires
> telepathy-mission-control-5.2.0-1.fc12
> --
> * Tue Aug 25 2009 Brian Pepple - 5.2.0-1
> - Update to 5.2.0.
> - Drop BR on libtelepathy.
> - Update url & source links.
> Broken deps for i386
> --
>
Arriving fashionably late, and mostly intact, to the "Constantine"
Alpha party I'd like to announce that Moblin on Fedora has made it's
initial debut for Fedora Mini :)
Still a work in progress, Moblin is now in a mostly usable state on
Fedora for testing. It has hence come well dressed for the al
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue
>> below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well.
> [snip]
>> IOErr
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue
>> below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well.
> [snip]
>> IOErr
Hi,
Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue
below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well.
Peter
Installing: xorg-x11-drivers # [804/807]
Installing: plymouth-gdm-hooks # [805/807]
In
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
This is updated with the current components that are in rawhide. All
the other packages should be pulled in by deps.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17
>>> Sorry but the fail here is 100% on bodhi's side , why does a single
>>> package obsolete a complete group update?
>>> That is just broken, and this example clearly showed it.
>>
>> It's broken (we've had some fun with that with the KDE grouped updates too,
>> we learned to be careful about what
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>> +
>> + mutter
>> + mutter-moblin
>> +
>
> Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-moblin does not currently
> require moblin? (And when it's
>> > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
>> > Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
>> > The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
>> > process from the build side of things but has written a NetworkManger
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Peter, thanks for all y
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Deskt
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Is "Moblin"
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
Yes
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
+
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ==
>
> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm
>> >>> After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
>> >>> > owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or
>> >>> > their
>> >>> > ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
>> >>> > information provided or percentage of compl
Hi Spot,
>>> After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
>>> > owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or their
>>> > ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
>>> > information provided or percentage of completion.
>>> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rahul
Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
>>> If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...
>>>
>>> We (Marketing) will be freezing t
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
> If you've got a moment for some last-minute help...
>
> We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are
> still somewhat light in the "what makes Fedora awesome for admins and
> developers?" categories.
>
> Right now we h
The F12 feature still indicates the switch to Empathy as a default IM
client in Fedora.
However, the talk page for the feature
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/Empathy) raises material
concerns that the switch to Empathy would result in an insufficiently
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said:
>> To note: it _is_ reported as a 586, so at least ancillary work in
>> yum/anaconda/rpm will be needed so that installing F12 on these
>> "supported but not quite 686 CPUs" is possible, avoi
> I've noticed that F12 will require a CPU with "i686" architecture, and
> that my Athlon 1.2GHz won't qualify. I accept that F11 is the last
> Fedora release that I'll be able to use. My concern is that many
> present Fedora users will be unpleasantly surprised that a new
> installation doesn't
>> pbrobinson:BADURL:Journal-99.tar.bz2:sugar-journal
>
> I'm pretty sure this has been obsoleted and is a dead package but I'm
> in the process of confirming the status and will update as appropriate
> once I have confirmation.
Confirmed the package is now dead and have completed the dead package
Hi,
> pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which
> returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and
> dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself
> linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single function,
> esp
Hi,
> pbrobinson:BADURL:Journal-99.tar.bz2:sugar-journal
I'm pretty sure this has been obsoleted and is a dead package but I'm
in the process of confirming the status and will update as appropriate
once I have confirmation.
> pbrobinson:BADURL:mojito-0.19.2.tar.bz2:mojito
This is fixed in cvs a
>> > > > a camera, a phone, a usb stick, or whatever gizmos you
>> > > > have at home...
>> > >
>> > > Real plastic and metal plugs only, or bluetooth connections as well?
>> >
>> > Bluetooth is definitively in scope.
>>
>> The scope seems worryingly large, to me, on this one. We could talk
>> abou
>> > I had the same confusion. So there are 3 drivers around: The vendor
>> > driver, the staging driver which is a fork of the vendor driver and
>> > the serialmonkey driver. Multiply that by 3 for rt2860, rt2870 and
>> > rt3070. And this leads to another confusion. Do (or will) the Fedora
>> > k
>> Thanks for the clarification. From what I read, I inferred that the
>> driver in /staging was the serialmonkey driver, but it seems I read it
>> wrong, and what it actually means to say was 'this is the vendor driver,
>> it sucks, don't contribute any code to this driver, contribute to the
>> se
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
