Never mind. Seems to be building now.
Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
> No problems building on F12, F11 and EL5.
>
> Here's the build log:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1901276&name=build.log
>
> But, the short version is that I'm getting a ton
No problems building on F12, F11 and EL5.
Here's the build log:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1901276&name=build.log
But, the short version is that I'm getting a ton of this error on rawhide
only: Cannot utime: Bad file descriptor
Any suggestions?
--
fedora-devel-list maili
Mat Booth wrote:
> 2009/11/19 Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. :
>> Here's the bug:
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539027
>>
>> The problem that I have is that I can't replicate the problem. I checked
>> out a clean copy of the devel directory and issu
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Eric Christensen (e...@christensenplace.us) said:
>>> It's a behavior change, for sure. For people who want to lock down their
>>> systems, it's a default they will need to be able to change, and they
>>> should have been able to discover it through the normal mechanisms f
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:53:16 -0700, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Tom \"spot\" Callaway wrote:
>> > On 11/18/2009 10:29 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>> >> Shouldn't I be getting f13 tags with "make tag"?
>> >
>
Tom \"spot\" Callaway wrote:
> On 11/18/2009 10:29 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>> Shouldn't I be getting f13 tags with "make tag"?
>
> If you run: cvs update -d in the top level checkout directory, you will.
> ;)
>
I did. What I generally run is
I'm trying to build cairomm 1.8.4 in devel, but the tags that I get are
dist-f12, and when I try and actually do the build I get an error saying:
/usr/bin/koji build dist-f12
'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/cairomm/devel#cairomm-1_8_4-1_fc12'
Usage: koji build [options] target URL
(Sp
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 July 2009 09:51:32 am Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 16:32, Rick L. Vinyard,
>>> Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>> I've built the following package on Fedor
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 09:51:32 am Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 16:32, Rick L. Vinyard,
>> Jr.
> wrote:
>> > I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without
>> any
>> > p
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/16/2009 10:32 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>> I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without any
>> problems.
>> http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.e
I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without any
problems.
http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-9.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm
However, when I try and build for EPEL 5 using mock on a F11 machine I get
the following in root.log:
DEBUG util.py:256: error: unpacking of arch
yersinia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
mailto:rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu>> wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> > Except it should be:
>> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 9 || 0%{?r
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> > Except it should be:
>> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 9 || 0%{?rhel} > 5
>>
>> it'd be nice if _all_ packages which have noarch subpackage use this
>> since most fedora packager reply to my such patches that they don't care
Ben Boeckel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> yersinia wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
&
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if
>>>> I
>>>> mark a subp
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote:
>
>> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
>> mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
>
> You can evaluate the %fedora variable to use this new feature only
> for Fedo
What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I
mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> maybe a trivial pygtk script ?
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
+1
I was just about to suggest that. And, if alot of the text items are not
embedded directly (i.e. loaded fr
18 matches
Mail list logo
