On 01/06/2010 01:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> [or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
> 666
>
We're ok. The original number may have been 616:
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedor
On 09/28/2009 10:27 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Robert Relyea wrote:
>
>> Currently there are also a half dozen features in mod_nss that aren't in
>> mod_ssl. SNI is definately something that would be welcomed in NSS, and
>> would p
On 09/26/2009 10:44 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> I read the wiki page[1] on Fedora's effort to consolidate all the
> crypto libraries. Quite an ambitious task! FWN [2] reported on the
> rather large discussion back in '07, but I didn't see any resolution.
> Is this still a goal for Fedora? The main wiki
On 09/27/2009 07:17 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
>> I read the wiki page[1] on Fedora's effort to consolidate all the
>> crypto libraries. Quite an ambitious task! FWN [2] reported on the
>> rather large discussion back in '07, but I didn't s
On 09/01/2009 06:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 07:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets installed/