On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:00 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Now make that work for the (not uncommon) case of clicking a link in evo
> or control-clicking one in gnome-terminal and expecting firefox to pop
> forward with that page.
That suggestion also fails for the PolicyKit dialog, and anything
sim
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 09:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Why not put everything in a single git repository?
That would require every packager to check out the entire package set,
all revisions, all branches. No thanks.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:14 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> This idea comes up a lot - that we can make Fedora packages be
> uncontroversial raw material, and then make the hard decisions at the
> spin level. (I'm speaking more generally than this particular issue.)
>
> It doesn't work practically: co
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:58 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Any package (whether new or an update) that adds/changes PolicyKit,
> consolehelper, or PAM configuration, and anything that installs new
> setuid/setgid executables, should require some additional third-party
> review. Any significant change
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:22 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I would almost consider it a security vulnerability and ask for a CVE to
> be issued.
It certainly seems like an easy path to a denial of service: just
install everything and run the machine out of disk space.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Descrip
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 11:09 -0300, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
> Maybe off topic but, how to correct color schemes for Epson Printers?
> Default is horrible (excess of red, wrong gamma/brightness, etc). I
> guess someone must have dealt with that.
Best is to talk directly with the gutenprin
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 20:02 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> You need to edit /etc/crypttab (man crypttab) to create a mapping for
> unencrypting the partition and /etc/fstab to mount the unencrypted
> volume.
This was what I needed, thank you.
After adding that line, I just needed to add a line to /etc
Hi,
When I installed rawhide-nearly-Fedora-12-Alpha a while back, I made
sure to encrypt the entire system. Works a treat.
I've now set up another encrypted drive (for backups), and want to add
it to the system so that it is mounted automatically. It uses the same
encryption password.
I can't
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure
> was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer,
> plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on
> it, or way I can submit
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 09:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Generally where I'd like to move to is where the RPM package defaults
> are appropriate for a shared computer lab PC, and the desktop spin
> kickstart modifies things as appropriate for the unmanaged home
> PC/laptop.
It would do this by wr
When defining a new policy mechanism for PolicyKit, what are the "rules"
for setting the default policy? PolicyKit's flexibility is excellent,
but it means that we have to choose sensible and consistent defaults for
each application that uses it.
I ask because the default policy for cups-pk-helpe
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:37 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> I "su -"
This has not been necessary since Fedora Core 6. Don't run it as root.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.red
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 00:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> To get closer to being on-topic for the list - is it perhaps not ported
> to PolicyKit 1.0 yet? Because it doesn't seem to work for me at all in
> Rawhide...can't find my network printer (which is really out there), and
> doesn't prompt fo
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 13:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ghostscript
> > ghostscript-
> > gtk --qf="%{NAME}: %{LICENSE}" | grep -vP '\bGPL(v3|\S*\+)' | sort
[...]
> > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-ghostscript: Baekmuk
> > cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript: Arp
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 22:47 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> This might cause problems for a bunch of packages.
>
> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ghostscript ghostscript-
> gtk --qf="%{NAME}: %{LICENSE}" | grep -vP '\bGPL(v3|\S*\+)' | sort
Wouldn't it be packages using the lib
Beginning with the 8.70 release, Ghostscript will be licensed as GPLv3+.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:23 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> Since I upgraded from the Garmin Edge 305 to the 705, I'm no longer
> using either of garmin-sync or its dependency pyusb on any sort of
> regular basis. This is probably less than ideal for adequately
> maintaining them.
I've taken pyusb
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 21:05 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote:
> >>> Unblocked orphan f-spot
> >
> > f-spot was only mentioned on Jesse's first list, so I wonder if it's
> > still listed as orphaned?
>
> That's because I've taken ownership of this package between these two
> p
My own opinion is that the package maintainer is responsible for
reporting bugs upstream when they are able to reproduce them.
One reason for my belief is that I've seen the situation from the other
side: as an upstream maintainer for a package, getting bug reports
directly from users of a package
19 matches
Mail list logo
