Hi!
As you might remember, we collected a list of questions that a few days
ago were sent to the Candidates of the next Fedora Board/FESCo
Elections(¹). I got most answers back in between (dgilmore should follow
soon; no response from ianweller yet, who seems to be traveling or
something according
Thorsten Leemhuis (fed...@leemhuis.info) said:
> The answers are quite interesting and as far as I can see can be quite
> helpful to decide whom to (not) vote for. So if you plan to vote in the
> elections I'd suggest you go and read the answers!
Thanks for doing this!
Bill
--
fedora-devel-lis
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>Thorsten Leemhuis (fed...@leemhuis.info) said:
>> The answers are quite interesting and as far as I can see can be quite
>> helpful to decide whom to (not) vote for. So if you plan to vote in the
>> elections I'd suggest you go and
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As you might remember, we collected a list of questions that a few days
> ago were sent to the Candidates of the next Fedora Board/FESCo
> Elections(¹). I got most answers back in between (dgilmore should follow
> soon; no respons
On 06/03/2009 04:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis (fed...@leemhuis.info) said:
>>> The answers are quite interesting and as far as I can see can be quite
>>> helpful to decide whom to (not) vote for. So if you plan to
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Thorsten, thanks not only to you for doing this,
Yeah. Thanks a lot as well.
> I'm disappointed this ended up being a more difficult process than you
> intended, but I have no doubt we can improve it for the next cycle.
Leaving a bit more time betwee
Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> Leaving a bit more time between the cut-off date for the questionaire and
> the town hall meeting should hopefully fix that.
Yes, there needs to be more time between the end of nominations and the town
hall meetings. When I went to sleep yesterday, the meeting time was
On Wed June 3 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I had planed to put them in the wiki as a table was well, but ran out of
> time, sorry (²).
I tried to add such a table[0], but I failed to enable the horizotnal
scrollbar. I even enabled javascript for the wiki, but it still does not work.
Is this
On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As you might remember, we collected a list of questions that a few days
> ago were sent to the Candidates of the next Fedora Board/FESCo
> Elections(¹). I got most answers back in between (dgilmore should follow
> soon; no response from ianweller yet,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Till Maas wrote:
> I tried to add such a table[0], but I failed to enable the horizotnal
> scrollbar. I even enabled javascript for the wiki, but it still does not
> work.
> Is this somehow broken in our mediawiki CSS setup? I noticed the css files
> contain overflow:hidden
On Thu June 4 2009, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Till Maas wrote:
> > I tried to add such a table[0], but I failed to enable the horizotnal
> > scrollbar. I even enabled javascript for the wiki, but it still does not
> > work. Is this somehow broken in our mediawiki CSS setup? I
Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to
answer all mails.
On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
[...]
>> I'm disappointed this ended up being a more difficult process than you
>> intended, but I have no doubt we ca
On 03.06.2009 23:02, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 06/03/2009 04:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:24:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Thorsten Leemhuis (fed...@leemhuis.info) said:
The answers are quite interesting and as far as I can see can be quite
helpfu
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:04:08PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to
> answer all mails.
>
> On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> [...]
> >> I'm disappointed this ended
On Thu June 4 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/answers-table.ods
>
> Both updated with the answers from Dglimore.
He has been added twice to the ods table.
Regards,
Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On 05.06.2009 21:42, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu June 4 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 03.06.2009 21:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>>> http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/answers-table.ods
>> Both updated with the answers from Dglimore.
> He has been added twice to the ods table.
Because h
Hi!
Sorry, late answer:
On 05.06.2009 21:28, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:04:08PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Sorry, was a bit busy over the past few days and didn't get around to
>> answer all mails.
>>
>> On 04.06.2009 00:30, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> * some people dislike questions like "do you prefer Gnome or KDE" that
> are/should be mostly irrelevant for Fedora as whole and the position the
> candidate is nominated for
It's pretty much relevant, we don't want GNOME bias all over the Fedora
governing bodies. For so
On 06/15/2009 01:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> * some people dislike questions like "do you prefer Gnome or KDE" that
>> are/should be mostly irrelevant for Fedora as whole and the position the
>> candidate is nominated for
>
> It's pretty much relevant, we don't want GN
19 matches
Mail list logo
