On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:55 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> 2) General purpose OS + release set versus targeted OS: Basically, do
> you block (or even slow) the release on a bug in say rsync or ocaml
> even if those things aren't dependencies of the UI or (any
> interesting) apps?
This is touching o
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Moblin and Fedora have rather different objectives. I'd be happy to work
> together on areas of joint interest, but I don't see the OSes as a
> whole converge, rather they will diverge even more than they already
> have.
Do you see that
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 12:04 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> The Moblin OS uses Connman for everything networking. This is a
>> different architecture than what Fedora does, where Fedora
>> has /etc/sysconfig and other scripts that do par
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 12:04 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> The Moblin OS uses Connman for everything networking. This is a
> different architecture than what Fedora does, where Fedora
> has /etc/sysconfig and other scripts that do part of the work etc. At
> first this looks like a minor change,
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:39:36 -0400
Michel Salim wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 12:04 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:06:33 +0100
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based
> > > on Fedora packages, the whole lo
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 12:04 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:06:33 +0100
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
> > Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
>
> Depends on how you look
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:31:55 -0700
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:32:25 -0700
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed
> > > patch is below a
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:32:25 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed
> > patch is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Is "Moblin" a trademark of anybody?
yes
I don
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:06:33 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
> Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
Depends on how you look at it ;-)
A bit less than half our packages are created using specbuilde
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
This is updated with the current components that are in rawhide. All
the other packages should be pulled in by deps.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:57 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> >> is below and feedback is welcome.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> +
> >> + mutter
> >> + mutter-moblin
> >> +
> >
> > Speaking of these t
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>> +
>> + mutter
>> + mutter-moblin
>> +
>
> Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-moblin does not currently
> require moblin? (And when it's
>> > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
>> > Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
>> > The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
>> > process from the build side of things but has written a NetworkManger
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> +
> + mutter
> + mutter-moblin
> +
Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
>> desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
>> breaking compatibility with any of the
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
> desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
> breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
> a general purposes OS like R
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
> > Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
> > The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
> > process from the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Eventually I plan on having a moblin spin but not for F-12. The work
> in Fedora at the moment is separate to anything that is coming from
> Moblin. The advantage that Fedora will have that at the moment
> upstream Moblin doesn't support an
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's re
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> >> is belo
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> Is "Moblin" a trademark of anybody?
Intel has handed over
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> >> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> >> is below and feedback is welcome.
> >
> > ... this seems small. Ther
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's really great.
I appreciate the work on introspection and gnome-s
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
>> is below and feedback is welcome.
>
> ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
Yes there are. I haven't a
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
Is "Moblin" a trademark of anybody?
If you're adding a group, be sure to add it to a category as well.
--
Jesse Keati
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
> is below and feedback is welcome.
... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
You'd want an entry in the desktop category as well. Also, you want to
give the localiza
Hi All,
I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
+
27 matches
Mail list logo
