On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:23 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I wanted to suggest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518880
> as a candidate for blocker status, because it's a regression in a
> well-publicized feature. (The maintainers are already aware of the
> problem and working on it,
Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/14/2009 05:23 AM Pacific Time:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:51:09PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Today was the first of many exciting blocker bug review meetings in
anticipation of the Fedora 12 Beta release. Thanks to everyone who
filed bugs and partici
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:51:09PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Today was the first of many exciting blocker bug review meetings in
> anticipation of the Fedora 12 Beta release. Thanks to everyone who
> filed bugs and participated in the discussion. I think we saw a much
> smoother release
Today was the first of many exciting blocker bug review meetings in
anticipation of the Fedora 12 Beta release. Thanks to everyone who
filed bugs and participated in the discussion. I think we saw a much
smoother release (or at least less surprises) of the Fedora 12 Alpha by
doing these revie
