On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 23:25 -0400, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> That was the rationale for vagalume ending up in rpmfusion-free: the
> code itself is fully free, but it's not usable without some
> patent-encumbered codecs.
>
> By that rationale, though, shouldn't totem-youtube end up in rpmfusi
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate
> without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship?
>
That was the rationale for vagalume ending up in rpmfusion-free: the
code itself is fully free, but it's not usab
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 20:41 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate
> without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship?
I don't think that's a valid point here. For one, Fedora already has the
Totem YouTube plugin packaged, which f
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hey all,
> I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
> (http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
> don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
> enough to be shipped but I want
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Does it have any functionality that the totem youtube plugin doesn't?
>
Honestly not sure, wasn't aware totem had a youtube plugin. I'll have
to check it out.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
-
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 08:38:49AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hey all,
> I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
> (http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
> don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
> enough to be shipped
Hey all,
I packaged up this app I stumbled upon called minitube
(http://flavio.tordini.org/minitube) but it seems a bit unstable and I
don't really want to toss it up to a package review until its stable
enough to be shipped but I wanted to mention it to see if anyone might
find a use for it, w