Orphaning some packages...

I'd like to turn over the following packages to someone else to maintain since I have no time or interest in keeping up with them going forward: * rubygem-activeldap -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among soft

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

i like vim , I'll take it. 2009/10/7 Orion Poplawski > On 10/06/2009 03:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > >> Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: >> >>> However, for personal reasons I >>> need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. >>> >> >> I have still on my list

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On 10/06/2009 03:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * ldapvi -- An interactive LDAP client (the best tool for managing LDAP s

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On 10/06/2009 11:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: > However, for personal reasons I > need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * cycle -- Calendar program for women (any ladies would like to decrease gender gap in Fedora packaging? Or would li

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 19:42 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > > Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: > >>> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution > >> > >> I would like to maintain this package then. > > > > Talk with Peter Ro

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Peter Robinson, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:09:20 +0100: >> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution > > I'll take this one. Released in pkgdb. Thanks. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Christoph Höger, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:23:01 +0200: > 2. The sync-ui binary (which I wanted to test the most ;)) is missing. It is not missing in devel (now F-12) package. But it is still not working correctly due to %{_libdir}/syncevolution packages. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedo

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: >>> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution >> >> I would like to maintain this package then. > > Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. I'll quite happily have someone to help co-mai

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: >> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution > > I would like to maintain this package then. Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/li

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Christoph Wickert, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:58:58 +0200: > I'm going to take over nimbus. I already reviewed it and you asked me > for co-maintenance. Sorry I didn't find the time to look into the EPEL > build error sooner, it's still on my todo list. Ownership released. Concernig bug https://bugzilla.

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

2009/10/3 Christoph Höger : > Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: >> > syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution >> >> I'll take this one. >> >> Peter > > > I've just commented on that package, but you're not yet maintaining it, > so I'll repeat what I've discussed wi

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: > > syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution > > I'll take this one. > > Peter I've just commented on that package, but you're not yet maintaining it, so I'll repeat what I've discussed with Matěj already: 1. There is some bug

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

> syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 14:51:15 -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > - "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > > Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that > > really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an > > upgrade and refer to that bug when they provi

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 15:26 + schrieb Matej Cepl: > syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc De

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:37 +, Matěj Cepl wrote: > That's why I am surprised you want to click through all those requests for > fixes > in non-essential packages. Why not leave them open (or allow updates only when > bug number is attached)? Because we don't have the infrastructure to handle

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > - "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: >> Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that >> really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an >> upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrad

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

- "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that > really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an > upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrade. Yes, of course, but I expect Fedora maintainers to b

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 17:37:18 +, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Jesse Keating redhat.com> writes: > > Releng and QA are very small groups. The Fedora package set is > > extremely large. Over 8K packages. The rate of change is far too grate > > to provide second guessing over every package. > >

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 15:26 + schrieb Matej Cepl: > I also wish to orphan these packages, and frankly I care about them much > less, so if nobody steps up, I will probably just let them die. > > JSDoc -- Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles > nimbus -- Deskt

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

Jesse Keating redhat.com> writes: > Releng and QA are very small groups. The Fedora package set is > extremely large. Over 8K packages. The rate of change is far too grate > to provide second guessing over every package. That's why I am surprised you want to click through all those requests fo

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

2009/10/2 Matej Cepl : > pspp -- A program for statistical analysis of sampled data I can take care of if. > jbrout -- Photo manager, written in python/pygtk > pyexiv2 -- Python binding to exiv2 (used by jbrout) I'm using it, so I'll take care of it.. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. --

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 15:26 +, Matej Cepl wrote: > > I am misunderstanding them (in case your interpretation is more correct). > So that's just that rel-eng doesn't have enough work to do (otherwise, > why they do not control only critical path components?). > Releng and QA are very small

Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

(intentionally breaking the thread so this is not burried somewhere in depths) Michal Schmidt, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:15:30 +0200: > You're misinterpreting Jesse's quote out of context. I am misunderstanding them (in case your interpretation is more correct). So that's just that rel-eng doesn't hav

Re: Orphaning some packages

Hi, sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > I am orphaning the following packages -- some of them because I no > longer use them, some of them because of the packaging overhead. > > Mono (Banshee dependencies) > ipod-sharp libipoddevice > podsleuth I've taken these two. Best regards, Christian --

Re: Orphaning some packages

Hi, sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > On these other packages, I'm reducing my involvement to being > co-maintainer, and new package owners are already selected when > ownership was released: > banshee [spot] If there is help needed, I'd like to volunteer co-maintaining banshee. I'm using bansh

Orphaning some packages

I am orphaning the following packages -- some of them because I no longer use them, some of them because of the packaging overhead. Mono (Banshee dependencies) ipod-sharp libipoddevice podsleuth Others: Io-language pidgin-rhythmbox On these other packages, I'm reducing my involvement to bein

Orphaning some packages

I've orphaned the following packages: - k3d (3D rendering Gnome app, active upstream) - plotutils (used by inkscape extension) - pstoedit (used by inkscape extension, looks like they just released a new version after 2 years of inactivity...) - alltray (recently reactivated upstream) - ghasher

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > >> I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain > >> them. > >> > >> clutter -- Open Source software

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: >> I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain >> them. >> >> clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical >> user interfaces >> clutter-cai

Re: Orphaning some packages

> clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget This one is deprecated upsteam and merged into clutter, I've already done most of the rawhide dead package stuff in bug [1] it just needs the obsoletes added to clutter. Cheers, Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507389 -- fed

Re: Orphaning some packages

On 07/28/2009 01:38 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything > else. > > co-maintaners are always welcome. That was fast. I applied to be a co-maintainer for all of them. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-lis

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain > them. > > clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical > user interfaces > clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget > clutter-gst -- Clutt

Re: Orphaning some packages

I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything else. co-maintaners are always welcome. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. > clutter -- Open Source software library for crea

Orphaning some packages

I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutter-- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairo

Re: Orphaning some packages

Am Sonntag, 26 Juli 2009 18:02:50 schrieb Stefan Posdzich: SP> I am orphaning this packages because i have _no_ time to maintain them... SP> SP> barrage SP> bastet SP> biniax SP> fbpanel SP> xpad SP> xqf So long and thanks for all the fish. I will take care of them, bro! If you want them back, I w

Orphaning some packages

I am orphaning this packages because i have _no_ time to maintain them... barrage bastet biniax fbpanel xpad xqf best regards Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On 06/03/2009 03:55 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some o

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedo

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > >> In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to > >> be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near fut

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance)

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 06/03/2009 05:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first bat

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On 06/03/2009 05:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: >> In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to >> be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting >> with this first batch. >> >> brasero (hig

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to > be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting > with this first batch. > > brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

> dates (inactive upstream) I'll take this one. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On 06/03/2009 12:50 PM, Denis Leroy wrote: > In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to > be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting > with this first batch. > > transmission Taken this. Co-maintainers welcome. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list m

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Denis Leroy wrote: > brasero (high-maintenance) > soundconverter > gstreamer-python (used by soundconverter, pitivi) I will request ownership on those one. -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:20 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to > be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting > with this first batch. I'm interested in taking over your hamradio related packages. > gpredict

Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) transmission k3d (fairly complex project, and it's actually a Gnome app) soundconverter gpredict grig gst

Orphaning some packages (gdhcpd, wxdfast, beagle)

Hi, I am looking for new maintainers for those packages: gdhcpd: I do not really use it, upstream has released a new version a while ago but the fedora package still is at the old version. Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/gdhcpd wxdfast: Upstream is pretty much dead (no