Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 09:27 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this
2009/9/15 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 09:27 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
[..]
Not completed ones, I check the date when fedora-review flag goes to
'+' .
Thanks for the clarification. Do you also check for packages that have
the flag set to '-'?
Not yet. I plan to
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept were
Parag AN(पराग), Andrew Overholt , and Jason Tibbitts. Below is the
number of
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
This looks like a nice initiative. I hope it will lead to more reviews getting
done and reduce the waiting time.
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Below is the
number of package reviews completed.
[55 bugzilla links]
Total reviews modified: 55
I think the wording needs
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 15:07 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
Hello,
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept ...
This means 1st till 12th September, right? What about
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews,
not finished ones. Not sure
2009/9/14 Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved