2009/9/17 Adam Williamson :
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
>> >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
>> >> guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or
>> >> mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit m
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:53 -0500, chasd wrote:
> One way to look at this problem is to separate those that need
> read-only access to a calendar from those that need both read
> and write capability.
>
> In our organization we have few that write to calendars,
> but many that consume calendar da
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:01 +0200, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This isn't a packaging discussion, no-one's rejecting packages here (we
> > probably have some of these servers packaged already). It's a Fedora
> > project service provision discussion; we want to provide a calen
Adam Williamson wrote:
(My thinking is that probably there's going to be a fairly even split
between those who want to use a calendaring system from a web front
end
and those who'd prefer to use it from a desktop app, and unless we
cater
to both groups, it won't really work; for a project-
Adam Williamson wrote:
This isn't a packaging discussion, no-one's rejecting packages here (we
probably have some of these servers packaged already). It's a Fedora
project service provision discussion; we want to provide a calendering
system as a Fedora project service, managed by infrastructure,
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 19:42 +0200, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > it's rather the case that we can't find anything that's even good
> > enough. it's strangely hard to find something that has a usable web
> > interface, CalDAV support
>
> Maybe you should drop the requireme
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:40 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > so to put it in fedora or rpmfusion-free, you'd have to drop
> tsmuxer; I
> > think it's optional.
>
> Yeah, I think it uses mplayer/mencoder over tsMuxer, and is
> configurable.
>From the discussion I've looked at, tsMuxer result
Adam Williamson wrote:
it's rather the case that we can't find anything that's even good
enough. it's strangely hard to find something that has a usable web
interface, CalDAV support
Maybe you should drop the requirement for a web interface. Mailservers don't
come with web interfaces either,
On 09/17/2009 11:25 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:46 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I had mediatomb installed, very much disliked it. It may have been my
ability to configure it as well. However it wasn't as easy as
ps3mediaserver. Granted I don't know if the ps3 one wi
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I would recommend you add the necessary infrastructure to the package to
> let it run as a service; although the website doesn't widely advertise
> the fact, it does actually run fine without X. I don't know if there's a
> parameter to fo
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:48 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> > 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
>
> > The Infrastructure group has a rather ongoing project to try and find a
> > really good calendar server system (and then, obviously, package it)
> ...
> > It's proved a bit tricky, though, to find a rea
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:46 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> I had mediatomb installed, very much disliked it. It may have been my
> ability to configure it as well. However it wasn't as easy as
> ps3mediaserver. Granted I don't know if the ps3 one will work with all
> media players, I think
On 09/17/2009 10:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or
mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
> >> guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or
> >> mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit more
> >> complex to create a prope
On 09/17/2009 07:48 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
>
>> The Infrastructure group has a rather ongoing project to try and find a
>> really good calendar server system (and then, obviously, package it)
>...
>> It's proved a bit tricky, though, to find a really perfect opti
R P Herrold wrote:
wow -- I sure don't see 'Calagator' mentioned on that page -- 'This
page was last modified on 26 March 2009' make it look like an
abandoned F-12 false start to me when I read the outlink:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Herlo/Fedora_Calendar_Project_Desired_Features_
2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
The Infrastructure group has a rather ongoing project to try and find a
really good calendar server system (and then, obviously, package it)
...
It's proved a bit tricky, though, to find a really perfect option.
'The perfect is the enemy of the good (enough)'
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> > 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
>>
>> > >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
>> > >> guess
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
>
> > >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
> > >> guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg o
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
> >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
> >> guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or
> >> mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit more
2009/7/13 Adam Williamson :
> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 20:15 -0600, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
>
>> Apple's Calendar Server. It runs using python 2.5 or greater (I've
>> installed it on a F11 machine and it work well). I've started looking
>> at some of its dependancies. 90% of them are in fedora already
On 09/16/2009 08:20 AM, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
I didn't because it still had quite a few patches that needed to go
upstream. I'll take a look at version 2.3...
Yeah the lib-patches is still full of patches...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.co
On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
That said, I have it up and running on an F11 host at home right
now,
satisfying everything else w/Fedora packages.
Yeah same here.
Did any of you create a calend
On 09/16/2009 08:02 AM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
That said, I have it up and running on an F11 host at home right now,
satisfying everything else w/Fedora packages.
Yeah same here.
Did any of you create a calendarserver R
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
That said, I have it up and running on an F11 host at home right now,
satisfying everything else w/Fedora packages.
Yeah same here.
Did any of you create a calendarserver RPM ?
That would give a head start trying to bu
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 20:15 -0600, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Apple's Calendar Server. It runs using python 2.5 or greater (I've
> installed it on a F11 machine and it work well). I've started looking
> at some of its dependancies. 90% of them are in fedora already, and of
> the ones in F11,
On Jul 10, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:22:20 Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
-vobject (we have python-vobject)
-pyflakes
I thought they were used if foun
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:22:20 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
> > > > -vobject (we have python-vobject)
> > > > -pyflakes
> > >
> > > I thought they were used if found... I'd have to l
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
> > > -vobject (we have python-vobject)
> > > -pyflakes
> >
> > I thought they were used if found... I'd have to look at the run file to
> > see if they ignore the system versions
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:02:45 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> >>> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > ..
> >>> Well their python run script checks for
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote:
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
..
Well their python run script checks for its dependancies, and if not
met will do a svn checkout of the right copy, however
On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
> > Well their python run script checks for its dependancies, and if not
> > met will do a svn checkout of the right copy, however, they don't keep
> > copies of
Hi,
>> So I've been toying with the idea of getting more involved with
>> fedora. Up till now if there has been a bug or other issue, i'll file
>> a bug or simply get the srpm and try to update it to a newer version,
>> or create my own specs / rpms when they don't already exist. Lately
>> I've
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
> Well their python run script checks for its dependancies, and if not
> met will do a svn checkout of the right copy, however, they don't keep
> copies of the libraries within their own repository. So if you fulfil
On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Apple's Calendar Server. It runs using python 2.5 or greater (I've
installed it on a F11 machine and it work well). I've started looking
at some of its dependancies. 90% of them are in fedora already, and
of
the ones in
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>So I've been toying with the idea of getting more involved with
> fedora. Up till now if there has been a bug or other issue, i'll file
> a bug or simply get the srpm and try to update it to a newer version,
> or create my own specs / rpms when they do
Hello,
So I've been toying with the idea of getting more involved with
fedora. Up till now if there has been a bug or other issue, i'll file
a bug or simply get the srpm and try to update it to a newer version,
or create my own specs / rpms when they don't already exist. Lately
I've fig
37 matches
Mail list logo
