2010/1/7 Zing z...@fastmail.fm:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
system with
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:43 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:17:02 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2010/1/7 Zing z...@fastmail.fm:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:36:59 + (UTC)
Zing z...@fastmail.fm wrote:
What makes you think these same users won't then also edit and enable
rawhide at this point? It's not much of a stretch to think these
seemingly innocent users might see this rawhide package, install,
and then also enable
Please do so. Entirely too many general users click-enable rawhide and
never even see the comments in the .repo file at all. They are never
presented a warning or anything of the sort.
Split it into an optional package, and anyone that understands what it is
will easily be able to install.
2010/1/7 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
Greetings.
I'd like to propose splitting out
the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo file into a
fedora-release-rawhide subpackage which is NOT installed by default or
shipped on the live media.
I wrote up this using the Feature template, but I don't
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:47:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd like to propose splitting out
the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo file into a
fedora-release-rawhide subpackage which is NOT installed by default or
shipped on the live media.
I wrote up this using the Feature template,
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:28:59 +
Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
You must do a lot more Fedora user support than I do; is it really a
frequent occurrence that users unwittingly enable Rawhide and screw up
their systems?
Not a criticism, I'm just surprised it happens at all.
Yeah, I
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
system with Rawhide, if one installs the repo file, e.g. only to be
able to
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 20:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I wrote up this using the Feature template, but I don't guess it's
really that much of a feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RawhideRepoSubpackage
(except in that it needs coordination across the distro and docs
updates,
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
system with Rawhide,
Greetings.
I'd like to propose splitting out
the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo file into a
fedora-release-rawhide subpackage which is NOT installed by default or
shipped on the live media.
I wrote up this using the Feature template, but I don't guess it's
really that much of a feature:
13 matches
Mail list logo
