On 05/30/2009 04:15 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
No objections to BuildRoot and %install parts, but I'd suggest leaving
%clean out of it for the time being, as this is on direct collision
course with the above suggestion of built-in default %clean.
If a built-in default %clean is coming, then
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Tom \spot\ Callaway wrote:
On 05/26/2009 04:10 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I vote for also removing the %clean section.
So, looking at this objectively, here are the technical problems:
* We're defining a BuildRoot in the spec, but that definition is no
longer used
On 05/26/2009 04:10 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I vote for also removing the %clean section.
So, looking at this objectively, here are the technical problems:
* We're defining a BuildRoot in the spec, but that definition is no
longer used (Fedora 10 or higher), because rpm now automagically
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:02:47PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Is anyone opposed to that?
Sounds like a very reasonable proposal.
I'll note that coughDebian/cough packages include a minimum
compatible standards (version) number. The RPM equivalent would I
suppose be something like:
