On Friday 05 June 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> I gave up and renumbered on my newest boxes. It sure is a pain today
> when I'm trying to use NFS between an old box and a new one.
>
> I think that Sun supports UID mapping on NFS but Linux does not.
It's supported with NFSv4. That might not
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 04/28/2009 03:04 AM, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> > What's the best way to handle that situation? One possibility is to
> > increase the threshold of system level id's (to 200? 300?)
>
> I guess I've been blissfully ignorant and always assumed that id's under
> 500 were reserv
Bill McGonigle writes:
> I guess I've been blissfully ignorant and always assumed that id's
> under 500 were reserved for system use since Redhat systems have
> always created the first user uid as 500.
I think it was 100 with early RHL.
I'm sure I had to renumerate UIDs, most probably between R
On 04/28/2009 03:04 AM, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
What's the best way to handle that situation? One possibility is to
increase the threshold of system level id's (to 200? 300?)
I guess I've been blissfully ignorant and always assumed that id's under
500 were reserved for system use since Redhat syst
| Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:30:48 -0400
| From: Bill Nottingham
| Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) said:
| > What's the best way to handle that situation? One possibility is to
| > increase the threshold of system level id's (to 200? 300?), another is
| > to check current reservation and clean l
