Le Ven 16 octobre 2009 07:18, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>
> On 10/16/2009 05:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
>>> it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11
On 10/16/2009 05:14 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
>> it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
>> pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that d
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
> it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
> pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that doesn't compile
> (missing dependencies among other thing
> Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
> it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
> pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that doesn't compile
> (missing dependencies among other things). Apache'
Can someone shed light on the status of geronimo in Fedora? Seems like
it hasn't managed to build since F11 - and the F11 build was never
pushed. There is a geronimo-spec 1.2 in CVS that doesn't compile
(missing dependencies among other things). Apache's site has version 2.1.4
