On 10/03/2009 12:21 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 02 October 2009 02:42:43 pm Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> enforcing dependencies between SysV and upstart scripts - if a package
>> that provides a service that a SysV service depends on (via LSB headers)
>> changes to an upstart script, thing
On Friday 02 October 2009 02:42:43 pm Bill Nottingham wrote:
> enforcing dependencies between SysV and upstart scripts - if a package
> that provides a service that a SysV service depends on (via LSB headers)
> changes to an upstart script, things go wrong.
Also last time I checked, they stil
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> 1) Likely for F-13 we're moving to upstart 0.6.x.
>
> 2) We currently have no mechanism for the following:
>
> - not starting services automatically that happen to have jobs installed
> - enforcing dependencies between SysV and upstart scr
Jeffrey Ollie (j...@ocjtech.us) said:
> I was wondering what the consensus on switching to native Upstart
> scripts (/etc/event.d/*) vs. keeping the "traditional" SysV init
> scripts (/etc/rc.d/init.d) for daemons was? I was looking at
> switching Asterisk over and have
I was wondering what the consensus on switching to native Upstart
scripts (/etc/event.d/*) vs. keeping the "traditional" SysV init
scripts (/etc/rc.d/init.d) for daemons was? I was looking at
switching Asterisk over and have an Upstart script that seems to work
fairly well. I would be
