On 05/28/2009 02:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Cry wrote:
>>
>> Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the
>> features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing?
>>
>
> I like that idea, I've retired firestarte
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Cry wrote:
>
> Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the
> features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing?
>
I like that idea, I've retired firestarter and will begin to file RFEs
once I outline some fea
Adam Miller gmail.com> writes:
>
> > If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the
> > bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't
> > aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing
> dead then I don't want to keep ol
> If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the
> bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't
> aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing
> to be the maintainer of it. Of course, if anyone is willing to do the
> work
On 05/27/2009 07:51 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned
> and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of
> small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon
> as I was able. But this morning there
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Adam Miller wrote:
I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned
and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of
small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon
as I was able. But this morning there was a
I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned
and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of
small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon
as I was able. But this morning there was a bug filed against it to
port it to PolicyKit
