On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 12:13 -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:32 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > 2009/9/15 Jerry Vonau :
> > > However, I see that the older buildinstall(s) are not present any
> > > more(?)! (File a bug I guess) If you were to add the buildinstall from
> > > F9's
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Thanks! Got it working as follows:
> 1. extract ISO
> 2. copy in new ks file
> 3. add more RPMs to Packages/ (using creative use of yumdownloader to
> make sure that deps come with the new RPMs)
> 4. createrepo --database --groupfile repod
2009/9/16 Jerry Vonau :
> That should be do-able using mkslim (read it first) from xs-livecd's git
> repo, along with my idea to use a pre-configured "updates repo" on the
> iso.
>
> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2009-February/002937.html
Thanks! Got it working as follows:
1. ext
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, devzero2000 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> filed as:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523698
>
> how to possibly fix the problem by a backport from rpm5.org as
suggested by
> Jeff Johnson.
>
For rpm 4.4 the backpo
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:32 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
> 2009/9/15 Jerry Vonau :
> > Are you just adding rpms to the install media? Or are you trying
> > something more difficult? I have a process in mind if you're just adding
> > rpms to the mix...
>
> Just adding RPMs would be enough, but also w
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> filed as:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523698
>
> how to possibly fix the problem by a backport from rpm5.org as suggested
by
> Jeff Johnson.
>
For rpm 4.4 the backport was already filled but reject.
https://
Hi,
filed as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523698
how to possibly fix the problem by a backport from rpm5.org as suggested by
Jeff Johnson.
Thanks,
Jan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-li
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:02:38 +0200, Daniel Drake wrote:
> We do have a F11 box
[...]
> I then tried to create a F9 chroot using mock, with the intention of
> running revisor or pungi inside. This doesn't work, because mock
> creates a v9 berkeley DB inside the chroot, but the libraries/apps
> insid
2009/9/15 Jerry Vonau :
> Are you just adding rpms to the install media? Or are you trying
> something more difficult? I have a process in mind if you're just adding
> rpms to the mix...
Just adding RPMs would be enough, but also we're customizing the
kickstart file a little.
> However, I see tha
2009/9/15 Martin Langhoff :
> I keep my build machine of F9 due to similar issues I saw building F7
> from F9 -- however, ISTR there's been some discussion of this
> recently. Hmmm, a bit of googling leads to a nice thread
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-buildsys-l...@redhat.com/msg02210.ht
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:47 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of difficulties/unfortunate circumstances are combining and
> causing me a headache. I'm looking for help/ideas on getting around
> these...
>
> I am trying to build a customized version of the OLPC XS school server
> for t
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I then tried to create a F9 chroot using mock, with the intention of
> running revisor or pungi inside. This doesn't work, because mock
> creates a v9 berkeley DB inside the chroot, but the libraries/apps
> inside the chroot only support bdb
Hi,
A number of difficulties/unfortunate circumstances are combining and
causing me a headache. I'm looking for help/ideas on getting around
these...
I am trying to build a customized version of the OLPC XS school server
for the OLPC deployment here in Nepal. The latest XS release is based
on F9.
13 matches
Mail list logo
