Nope, Bryce doesn't get to work on upstream in any significant way as
part of his Ubuntu work. I was chatting with Dave about this on IRC the
other day. The most significant submission to upstream X.org that's ever
come out of Ubuntu is a quirk table. (yippee.)
Did you chatted with Bryce?
--
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:01 +, Ikem Krueger wrote:
Nope, Bryce doesn't get to work on upstream in any significant way as
part of his Ubuntu work. I was chatting with Dave about this on IRC the
other day. The most significant submission to upstream X.org that's ever
come out of Ubuntu
Linuxguy123 wrote:
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Ubuntu-X.org-Guru-Calls-for-
Desktop-Help
They did exactly what some people suggested we do in this thread: stick with
an old X.org X11 release and try to fix its bugs on their own. You can see
the result in the article and its
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:01 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Ubuntu-X.org-Guru-Calls-for-Desktop-Help
Let's see if I can summarize this article:
- we're getting too many bugs
- more testing will find more bugs
- therefore we should test more so we have fewer
Le 30/11/2009 18:01, Linuxguy123 a écrit :
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Ubuntu-X.org-Guru-Calls-for-Desktop-Help
Instead of whining, he should ask his employer to hire more X hackers,
one guy is obviously not *enough*.
This has nothing to do with our issue and Fedora at all.
Le 30/11/2009 20:28, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
What is your definition of hacker? Is he contributing to X.org
upstream development or is he just pulling patchsets to be applied to
distribution specific packages?
Likely the second option, I'd expect from the company claiming
leadership on the
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:28 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of whining, he should ask his employer to hire more X hackers,
one guy is obviously not *enough*.
This has nothing to do with our issue and Fedora at
