Hi,
the repository at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages/
contains a lot of rawhide (f12) packages, so it can no longer be used
on f11, was that intentional?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
OK, I have finally
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:16:41PM -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
Jindrich
One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
The main texlive package now contains a dependency to
texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be
pulled in automatically when just installing texlive.
Thank you. :-)
It is nice to see texlive-2009 shaping so well for
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:47:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
Jindrich
Thank you. Now I have installed on rawhide and it works (TM). :-)
--
José Abílio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
Jindrich
One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with
yum install texlive-*-doc
I get a missing dependency
texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
Jindrich
One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with
yum install texlive-*-doc
I get a missing
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with
the
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
On Monday 31 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now.
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
tetex-IEEEtran
tetex-bytefield
tetex-elvevier
tetex-perltex
tetex-prosper
and these utilities:
dvipdfm
2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
I think
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex
2009/9/1 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
IIRC xdvipdfmx is from texlive (but has not been updated for some time)
Well, technically, upstream is the xetex project
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=xetex_linux
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse
singularit...@gmx.net wrote:
SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat
SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit:
SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:14:33PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install
texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead
This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by
texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum
Hello,
I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should
take my comments with caution...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
tetex-tex4ht
I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse
singularit...@gmx.net wrote:
SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat
SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit:
SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket
SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende
SG
On Saturday 29 August 2009 Stefan Grosse wrote:
Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on
dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible.
This is one of those cases where rpm Suggests would be appropriate (when/if
implemented). LyX does not depend in any way
Message du 27/08/09 16:38
De : Jindrich Novy
A : fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Copie à : fedora-fonts-l...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com
Objet : Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:40:25PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: tetex-fonts is needed by package
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: tetex = 3.0 is needed by package
jadetex-3.13-5.fc11.noarch (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: tetex is
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:02:18 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com
wrote:
JN - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The
JN lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing
JN texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that
JN lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked
Hi,
first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
in the testing repository:
rpm -i
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
If you use the older TeX Live 2009 packages, please
25 matches
Mail list logo
