2009/10/1 Jens Petersen
> > IMHO default packages in default groups should have a clear user, or
> > be downgraded to optional.
>
> Right I suggest we make it optional in comps-f13 and see if anything
> "breaks".
>
Yep, this looks nice
In merge review of bitmap-fonts, we are splitting it as per
> IMHO default packages in default groups should have a clear user, or
> be downgraded to optional.
Right I suggest we make it optional in comps-f13 and see if anything "breaks".
Jens
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-d
Le Mer 30 septembre 2009 16:35, Qianqian Fang a écrit :
>
> Jens Petersen wrote:
>> We have been looking at updating bitmap-fonts recently,
>> and noticed that it is still listed mandatory in the comps
>> @base-x group.
>>
>> So I just wondered a couple of naive questions:
>>
>> - does bitmap-fon
> XEmacs needs it. We have an explicit reference to a LucidaTypewriter
> font.
Sure: and xorg-x11-fonts also provides LT.
I am not asking if we should drop bitmap-fonts
(though it needs to be split up and repackaged)...
the question was why are we installing it by default
and when can we stop? :
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> We have been looking at updating bitmap-fonts recently,
> and noticed that it is still listed mandatory in the comps
> @base-x group.
>
> So I just wondered a couple of naive questions:
>
> - does bitmap-fonts have to be installed by default
We have been looking at updating bitmap-fonts recently,
and noticed that it is still listed mandatory in the comps
@base-x group.
So I just wondered a couple of naive questions:
- does bitmap-fonts have to be installed by default?
- what actually needs it?
Jens
--
fedora-devel-list mailing lis
