Hi,
On 08/28/2009 09:13 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
Is it really true that nobody else uses cpqarrayd? If so what do people
use to monitor the HP/Compaq hardware in the Proliant range of servers?
I'm using http://sourceforge.net/projects/cciss/files/cciss_vol_status/
for that purpose, with a
On 27/08/09 16:08, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/27/2009 06:02 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where s
On 08/27/2009 06:02 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
> I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
> Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
> this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where should
> I send the patch ... the last d
Dan Horák wrote:
Howard Wilkinson píše v Čt 27. 08. 2009 v 11:02 +0100:
I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where should
I send
Howard Wilkinson píše v Čt 27. 08. 2009 v 11:02 +0100:
> I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
> Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
> this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where should
> I send the patch ...
I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where should
I send the patch ... the last development on this was in 2007 so it is
probably not
