Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these
> fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that
> the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is
> impossible) if the prefix is not there.
> There isn't eno
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> lzma-sdk-java is good but on the other hand, lzma's java SDK is called
> "SevenZip".
That's just its internal name. It's not officially called anything other
than "LZMA SDK".
> I'd like to remind everyone that unlike perl, tcl/tk, ... ; the word
> "java" doesn't need to tak
On Thursday 25 June 2009, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these
> fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that
> the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is
> impossible) if the prefix is no
ä"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:17:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: doubt regarding package name
> Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible
> on tools adn scripts and should be avoide
> Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible
> on tools adn scripts and should be avoided.
Tools that make such assumptions need fixing.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible on
> tools adn scripts and should be avoided.
>
> Why not lzma-sdk-java lzma-sdk-sharp etc.?
>
I think that's a problem of those tools/scripts and not of this pac
:06 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: doubt regarding package name
> Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
> >
> > Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
> > accordance to packaging guidelines ?
> Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
> >
> > Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
> > accordance to packaging guidelines ?
> >
> > LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html
>
> So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
>
> Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
> accordance to packaging guidelines ?
>
> LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html
So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version of that SDK, whic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
accordance to packaging guidelines ?
LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html
--
Regards,
Rakesh Pandit
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://ww
10 matches
Mail list logo