Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Fernando Nasser wrote: > Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these > fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that > the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is > impossible) if the prefix is not there. > There isn't eno

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > lzma-sdk-java is good but on the other hand, lzma's java SDK is called > "SevenZip". That's just its internal name. It's not officially called anything other than "LZMA SDK". > I'd like to remind everyone that unlike perl, tcl/tk, ... ; the word > "java" doesn't need to tak

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-25 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 25 June 2009, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these > fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that > the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is > impossible) if the prefix is no

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-25 Thread Fernando Nasser
ä" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:17:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: doubt regarding package name > Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible > on tools adn scripts and should be avoide

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-25 Thread Ville Skyttä
> Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible > on tools adn scripts and should be avoided. Tools that make such assumptions need fixing. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-25 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible on > tools adn scripts and should be avoided. > > Why not lzma-sdk-java   lzma-sdk-sharp  etc.? > I think that's a problem of those tools/scripts and not of this pac

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-25 Thread Fernando Nasser
:06 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: doubt regarding package name > Rakesh Pandit wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 > > > > Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in > > accordance to packaging guidelines ?

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-24 Thread Ville Skyttä
> Rakesh Pandit wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 > > > > Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in > > accordance to packaging guidelines ? > > > > LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html > > So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version

Re: doubt regarding package name

2009-06-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rakesh Pandit wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 > > Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in > accordance to packaging guidelines ? > > LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version of that SDK, whic

doubt regarding package name

2009-06-24 Thread Rakesh Pandit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in accordance to packaging guidelines ? LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html -- Regards, Rakesh Pandit -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://ww