From: "Andrew Haley"
> OK, so you've got a configuration problem, with a bleeding-edge
> jpackage overriding the stable FC4 release.
No, it is not a configuration problem. My system is
configured properly, and the upstream packages are
broken. And unless FC4 was EOLed on the very same
day FC5 was
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > My guess is your yum is pointed at FC4.
>
> Sorry I didn't mention it, it is indeed. It's just
> broken for FC4 :) People still use it, no?
Well, this is fedora-devel-list.
OK, so you've got a configuration problem, with a bleeding-edge
jpackage
Dnia 20-03-2006, pon o godzinie 17:57 -0500, Dimi Paun napisał(a):
> Sorry I didn't mention it, it is indeed. It's just
> broken for FC4 :) People still use it, no?
This is fedora-devel, not old-fedora-support ;)
Lam
signature.asc
Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo
From: "Andrew Haley"
> My guess is your yum is pointed at FC4.
Sorry I didn't mention it, it is indeed. It's just
broken for FC4 :) People still use it, no?
--
Dimi Paun
Lattica, Inc.
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > I think you've got yum pointing at jpackage.org, not fedora.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Get rid of whatever yum config you have pointing at jpackage.org, and
> > you'll see this:
>
> Do we really need this sort of incompatibilities?
>
> >
>
From: "Andrew Haley"
> I think you've got yum pointing at jpackage.org, not fedora.
Yes.
> Get rid of whatever yum config you have pointing at jpackage.org, and
> you'll see this:
Do we really need this sort of incompatibilities?
>
==
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > Heh, 1jpp_2rh > 1jpp, yum should update it, no?
> >
> > No.
>
> Why? Something is broken: my system got into this state
> without me doing anything wrong.
>
> > Yes. Remove it with `rpm -e'. Install it with `yum install'.
>
> Still co
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 17:04 -0500, Dimi Paun wrote:
> Package Arch Version RepositorySize
>
> =
> Installing:
> jpackage-utils noarch 1.6.6-1jpp jpackage16-
From: "Andrew Haley"
> > Heh, 1jpp_2rh > 1jpp, yum should update it, no?
>
> No.
Why? Something is broken: my system got into this state
without me doing anything wrong.
> Yes. Remove it with `rpm -e'. Install it with `yum install'.
Still couldn't be found:
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -e jpackage-ut
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
> > > jpackage-utils-1.6.6-1jpp
> >
> > You have a bad version of jpackage-utils; remove it and get one from
> > `yum install'. You need version 1jpp_2rh.
>
> Heh, 1jpp_2rh > 1jpp, yum should update it,
From: "Andrew Haley"
> > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
> > jpackage-utils-1.6.6-1jpp
>
> You have a bad version of jpackage-utils; remove it and get one from
> `yum install'. You need version 1jpp_2rh.
Heh, 1jpp_2rh > 1jpp, yum should update it, no?
But it can't find it anywhere:
[r..
Dimi Paun writes:
> From: "Andrew Haley"
> > > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers
> > > file /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is not owned by any package
> >
> > It's in jpackage-utils.
>
> Not here:
>
> [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
> jpackage-utils
From: "Andrew Haley"
> > [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers
> > file /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is not owned by any package
>
> It's in jpackage-utils.
Not here:
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
jpackage-utils-1.6.6-1jpp
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -ql jpackage-util
Dimi Paun writes:
> This package is giving me grief as well:
>
> [r...@dimi ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh.FC4.1.i386
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.84077: line 8: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers: No such
> file or directory
> error: %postun(java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_3
This package is giving me grief as well:
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh.FC4.1.i386
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.84077: line 8: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers: No such
file or directory
error: %postun(java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh.FC4.1.i386)
scriptlet failed, ex
15 matches
Mail list logo
