On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Peter Gordon wrote:
>
> From my own brief testing, Epiphany has no apparent problems with it
> either.
>
> I think it should be fine as an update; but like any other version bump,
> we'd want to have it in updates-testing for a reasonable amount of time
> before p
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Note that this update does not change ABI.
> It's a stable bugfix release only...
>
> kevin
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
Sorry, I should
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
> release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
> out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
> build against webkitgtk i
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:02:04 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> > There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the
> > current release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I
> > wanted to shoot out to the list to find out if
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
> release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
> out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
> build against webkitgtk i
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
build against webkitgtk if I were to build the latest as a potential
stable update for
