Re: possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?

2009-08-10 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andre Robatino wrote: > On 08/07/2009 08:26 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: >> yum also uses i386 for $basearch which causes (well, it's >> chicken-and-egg) repos to have i386 directories. These should >> also go with this update I imagine. > > Is it possible

Re: possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?

2009-08-10 Thread Andre Robatino
On 08/07/2009 08:26 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Andre Robatino wrote: > >> The names of the 32-bit Live CDs already use i686, consistent > with the >> minimum required arch. But the 32-bit DVD still uses i386, > despite the >> fact that not only has i586 been required for years, but with > the i586

Re: possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?

2009-08-07 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andre Robatino wrote: > The names of the 32-bit Live CDs already use i686, consistent with the > minimum required arch. But the 32-bit DVD still uses i386, despite the > fact that not only has i586 been required for years, but with the i586 > pack

Re: possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?

2009-08-07 Thread Andre Robatino
And the 32-bit CD sets, too - I forgot about those. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?

2009-08-07 Thread Andre Robatino
The names of the 32-bit Live CDs already use i686, consistent with the minimum required arch. But the 32-bit DVD still uses i386, despite the fact that not only has i586 been required for years, but with the i586 package rebuild, there aren't even any i386 packages on the DVD anymore. Now i686 is