yum-presto plugin by default

2009-07-25 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi, Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-17 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi, > > Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide? > > Rahul No answer here after weeks. After some lengthy discussion with rel-eng team in irc, not much care either way. Talked to desktop team and based on their recommendation, I have added y

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-17 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:35:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide? > > > > Rahul > > No answer here after weeks. > > After some lengthy discussion with rel-eng team in irc, not much care

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/8/18 Chuck Anderson : > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:35:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide? >> > >> > Rahul >> >> No answer here after weeks. >> >> After some lengthy discussion with

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: > FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it > would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable. > Updates would get done faster and mirrors would be able to cope with > more connections, especially

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread drago01
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Brown > wrote: >> FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it >> would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable. >> Updates would get done faster and mir

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:47 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Only potential side effect is cpu consumption that the delta unpacking > process requires. User on single core systems may notice that unless > presto renices itself down in priority. The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow d

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow disks.  With a > local mirror the time to re-make the deltas is far longer than the time > to just pull down the entire packages. Time isn't the only metric...people may also be concerned

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > -jef"speaking of metered bandwidth..I need to remember to work from > barnes and nobles instead of working from home this winter..so i can > steal power, wireless and a nice warm fire"spaleta Nice warm fire? you're going to burn all the boo

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Steven James Drinnan
I would hold off on the default thing. I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck. All I know is that after I re-installed and upgraded I have had no problems -1 to installing it by default in F12. S

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > I would hold off on the default thing. > > I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and > NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck. > > All I know is that after I re-instal

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:36:15AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: > > I would hold off on the default thing. > > > > I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and > > NetworkManager. I do not know how but f