I have FDS installed on FC3 and configured to talk to a SBS AD server.
I believe all is well as far as SSL certificates go and if I leave the
"Sync New Windows Users" option off in my Windows replication agreement,
I can readily complete full resyncs and incremental. All of my
non-regular use
Bryan wrote:
This question is probably completely obvious to those more versed in
LDAP, which I am not. And since I couldn't find an answer to this in
the Wiki, I thought that it didn't hurt to ask.
So what are the advantages of using a "specialized" LDAP server,
whether Fedora/Red Hat Di
Adam has (been) volunteered to add this to the wiki under the samba
howto. Go, Adam!
--Chris
Adam Stokes wrote:
I have taken some time out to write up a rough draft on integrating
samba with RHDS/FDS. Please have a look and I welcome any and all
comments/modifications.
http://people.redhat.c
Rich Megginson wrote:
Yes. There are two different connections. The main connection is from
FDS to AD - FDS does an LDAP BIND to AD to issue a sync request. When
you configure the windows sync agreement on FDS (usually using the
console), you have to specify the DN of the user
Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID) wrote:
Thank you, I manage to download the binary RPM of RHEL 4 on my workstation.
Now, I setup the FD to sync with MS AD domain which we have here, but one
question I have do I need to have enterprise admin right to sync the FD to
the AD DC server to pull user i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Sam Tran
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Advantages of using FDS
> vs OpenLDA
Thank you, I manage to download the binary RPM of RHEL 4 on my workstation.
Now, I setup the FD to sync with MS AD domain which we have here, but one
question I have do I need to have enterprise admin right to sync the FD to
the AD DC server to pull user infos and etc?
Right now when I want to s
I have taken some time out to write up a rough draft on integrating
samba with RHDS/FDS. Please have a look and I welcome any and all
comments/modifications.
http://people.redhat.com/astokes/samba_rhds.pdf
http://people.redhat.com/astokes/samba_rhds.html
Of course the links can be found at http:/
Get the binary rpm. It installs just fine on RHEL 3 and 4 as per my testing.
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting "Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I would like to know when I run the builddsrpm.sh RHEL4 command, I get a
> > message saying that it cann
Quoting "Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would like to know when I run the builddsrpm.sh RHEL4 command, I get a
message saying that it cannot find RHEL4-ds.spec file.
Just curious - is there a reason you have not downloaded the binary RPM, that
doesn't require you to compile
Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID) wrote:
I would like
to know when I run the
builddsrpm.sh RHEL4 command, I get a message saying that it cannot find
RHEL4-ds.spec file.
Would anyone
know where do I get this
RHEL4-ds.spec file from?
You cannot currently build the entire FDS p
I would like to know when I run the
builddsrpm.sh RHEL4 command, I get a message saying that it cannot find
RHEL4-ds.spec file.
Would anyone know where do I get this
RHEL4-ds.spec file from?
Thanks,
From: Talwar, Puneet
(NIH/NIAID)
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005
However according to that paper multi-master replication could lead to
inconsistencies:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-02.txt
What do you think?
Kurt's views do not represent the majority of the Directory
Server vendor
community (actually quite the reverse :
Sam Tran wrote:
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Sam Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was wondering how FDS compares with OpenLDAP in terms of performance.
Well, its faster, in our case (and I say that tongue-in-cheek). Our curren
Joshua Kampmeier wrote:
I was wondering if the Fedora Directory Server supports Windows clients? I
didn't see anything on the site about it. Sorry if it's there and I just missed
it.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listin
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Sam Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I was wondering how FDS compares with OpenLDAP in terms of performance.
>
> Well, its faster, in our case (and I say that tongue-in-cheek). Our current
> primary directory server is running on a dual 168M
Quoting Sam Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was wondering how FDS compares with OpenLDAP in terms of performance.
Well, its faster, in our case (and I say that tongue-in-cheek). Our current
primary directory server is running on a dual 168Mhz Ultra 2 Sun box. And our
secondary is a Sparcstation 1
Sam Tran wrote:
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of using
RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server?
The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is
official support
(and
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of using
> RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server?
>
> The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is
> official support
> (and at the prices I was q
Kevin Myer wrote:
If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of
using
RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server?
The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is
official support
(and at the prices I was quoted per year, for two servers, I cou
If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of using
RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server?
The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is
official support
(and at the prices I was quoted per year, for two servers, I could hire half a
perso
Quoting Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks, Kevin.
Can I make a feature request to whoever sees this that is way better
at Java/C than me to at least make the stored password crypted in
something stronger than rot13?
Just my opinion, but its kind of moot what format its stored in, as
lo
Brian Jones wrote:
Thanks, Kevin.
Can I make a feature request to whoever sees this that is way better
at Java/C than me to at least make the stored password crypted in
something stronger than rot13?
What would you suggest? Note that a determined attacker will be able
to decode anythi
Kevin Myer wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/intro.htm#39523
NB: you trade the ease of startup with a security risk, in that your
keyphrase
is stored in a file cleartext.
Right. Very secure environments invest in hardware crypto
devices/dongles that provide this fun
Thanks, Kevin.
Can I make a feature request to whoever sees this that is way better
at Java/C than me to at least make the stored password crypted in
something stronger than rot13?
On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/intro.htm#395
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/intro.htm#39523
NB: you trade the ease of startup with a security risk, in that your
keyphrase
is stored in a file cleartext.
Kevin
Quoting Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all.
I hit a snag yesterday when I rebooted my directory server
Hi all.
I hit a snag yesterday when I rebooted my directory server box
(running RHEL 4). The problem is that I'm using SSL/TLS, and that
means that every time I restart the directory server I have to provide
the password for the certificate database. Now, I *know* that this
would never stand in a
Bryan wrote:
This question is probably completely obvious to those more versed in
LDAP, which I am not. And since I couldn't find an answer to this in
the Wiki, I thought that it didn't hurt to ask.
So what are the advantages of using a "specialized" LDAP server,
whether Fedora/Red Hat D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam/Rich,
the only way that {MD5} has worked for me in the past (using OpenLDAP)
was if the actual MD5 hash was binary data. the following are all
hashes of the password "test", and in OL they all work equally:
{CRYPT}ch.V5DKiTQWmc
{CRYPT}$1$cpSVhP
Though, using Samba3 as an nt4 domain controller works fine.
True, although one might be slightly concerned about continued MS support
for the NT4 protocols in the client.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
David Boreham wrote:
Joshua Kampmeier wrote:
I was wondering if the Fedora Directory Server supports Windows
clients? I didn't see anything on the site about it. Sorry if it's
there and I just missed it.
FDS is an LDAP server : so it supports any LDAP client, which would of
course
include
Joshua Kampmeier wrote:
I was wondering if the Fedora Directory Server supports Windows clients? I
didn't see anything on the site about it. Sorry if it's there and I just missed
it.
FDS is an LDAP server : so it supports any LDAP client, which would of
course
include software running on t
I was wondering if the Fedora Directory Server supports Windows clients? I
didn't see anything on the site about it. Sorry if it's there and I just missed
it.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
33 matches
Mail list logo
