RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
--- "Tay, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please re-install with your choice of baseDN, be it > dc=composers,dc=foo,dc=com or > dc=foo,dc=com. I reinstalled it -- it works a lot better now! bash-2.03# ldaplist -l ldaplist: Object not found (LDAP ERROR (50): Insufficient access.) bash-2.03# i

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Samba + FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Adam Stokes
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:30:28 +1000 James van Zeeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Turning off selinux protections for Samba solves issue > > J > > On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:23, James van Zeeland wrote: > > Scratching my head on samba integration. > > > > I can login Posix users OK, i.e. go to di

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
--- Justin Albstmeijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just looked at my test solris client.. and got the same error.. > It seems "ldapclient -P..." will even complete with the wrong proxyagent > password.. (only uses this to create the NS1 password) and fetches the > profile anonymous.. > > so

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Wishlist

2005-08-25 Thread Rich Megginson
That's a very good question. The "one structural objectclass" rule probably comes from X.500. Can you post this same question to the ldap@umich.edu list? There are many people there who are knowledgeable about the roots of LDAP and X.500 who would probably be able to answer your question.

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Tay, Gary
"ldapclient" result indicates that your "domainame" does not tally with "nisDomain" object in the rootDN entry, it is kind of messy, here and there. Please re-install with your choice of baseDN, be it dc=composers,dc=foo,dc=com or dc=foo,dc=com. If you change /etc/defaultdomain, to take immed

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Wishlist

2005-08-25 Thread Jeff Clowser
Sorry to dredge up a really old thread, but I've been trying to track down something about it that's been bothering me. Basically, part of the thread devolved to the idea of creating a single user entry that has objectclasses: inetorgperson, account, posixaccount, shadowaccount, etc. If I un

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Tay, Gary
It is kind of messy here, pls don't continue to do any other thing, I strongly suggest you start from FRESH and reinstall FDS7.1 again. OK assuming you prefer to use foo.com as the LDAP domain (nisdomain), the baseDN (where the topmost rootDN is) will be dc=foo,dc=com, if you choose "populate

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
This is gonna be lng... I just want to thank you guys again for wading thru this crap... --- "Tay, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > === > Do you still think I need to change my defaultSearchDN? Also, must those > ACLs be added > still? Because it looks like you're doing a manual config

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Justin Albstmeijer
Just looked at my test solris client.. and got the same error.. It seems "ldapclient -P..." will even complete with the wrong proxyagent password.. (only uses this to create the NS1 password) and fetches the profile anonymous.. so do you get: libsldap: Status: 49 Mesg: openConnection: simple bi

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
--- "Tay, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you should put "objectclass=*" (search filter) at the end, see > "man ldapsearch" > > If you need to do anything and are not familar with LDAP command tools, > use the admin server to do it. > > IIRC all your LDAP data should have baseDN dc=

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Tay, Gary
=== Do you still think I need to change my defaultSearchDN? Also, must those ACLs be added still? Because it looks like you're doing a manual config, right? === Yes I think you should set baseDN (defaultSearchBase) to dc=composers,dc=foo,dc=com, NOT dc=foo,dc=com, it should correspond LDAP doma

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
--- Justin Albstmeijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you will see that "ldaplist -l passwd {username}" will not show the > password field.. > > the proxyagent user needs read access to all userPassword fields.. this > can be done with the controlpanel of FDS.. Alright. This the aci I added:

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Justin Albstmeijer
> I did. It kept failing until I got rid of "-a default" "-a" is the authentication method... I think you wanted to use "-P default". In your case no problem, because it defaults to it.. but in case you want to use a different profile... -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-u

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Justin Albstmeijer
>> serviceSearchDescriptor: group: ou=group,dc=foo,dc=com Did you create this "ou=group,dc=foo,dc=com", because default FDS has a "ou=Groups,dc=foo,dc=com". I used that one, by adding the "posixgroup" object to "ou=Groups,dc=foo,dc=com" and adding the following attribute to the profile. NS_LDAP

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Justin Albstmeijer
you will see that "ldaplist -l passwd {username}" will not show the password field.. the proxyagent user needs read access to all userPassword fields.. this can be done with the controlpanel of FDS.. > So, looks like it worked but I can't authenticate any users. id testdba > produces traffic >

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Igor
Gary, thank you for the replies. (I do have the patch you mentioned:) bash-2.03# showrev -p | grep "^Patch: 108993-48" Patch: 108993-48 Obsoletes: 108827-40, 108991-18, 109322-09, 109461-03, 111641-0 [...] --- "Tay, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 0) As mentioned in previous email, use "ldap

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Samba + FDS

2005-08-25 Thread James van Zeeland
Turning off selinux protections for Samba solves issue J On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:23, James van Zeeland wrote: > Scratching my head on samba integration. > > I can login Posix users OK, i.e. go to directory console create a user, > enable posix attributes, set UID and GID, create a home director

[Fedora-directory-users] Samba + FDS

2005-08-25 Thread James van Zeeland
Scratching my head on samba integration. I can login Posix users OK, i.e. go to directory console create a user, enable posix attributes, set UID and GID, create a home directory and the user can login. Have followed the howto linked to from docs page. Attempting to login with samba from an XP w

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Tay, Gary
Thanks for the info, I did say "USED TO WORK VERY WELL". I remembered it worked for me "once" or "twice" for a default profile using "simple" bind, after that when I tried to enhance it to TLS profile using "tls:simple" bind, it started to sing song. Again I wish you could prove me wrong the next

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] getting solaris 8 to talk to FDS

2005-08-25 Thread Justin Albstmeijer
> 1) The "ldapclient -P ..." command line which downloads LDAP profile > from LDAP Server, USED TO WORK VERY WELL is not working anymore. Strange Gary, "ldapclient -P ..." still works fine for me on Solaris 8 (108993-48), with FDS 7.1. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-user