I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very
impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with the
server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is best
to keep with the current static version that is provided via the source
download
Scott Boggs wrote:
I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very
impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with
the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is
best to keep with the current static version that is provided via
Hi.
Is there any way to sync FDS crypt passwords with Active Directory or do
they have to be encrypted with SSHA ?
Jon
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Unfortunately, the Microsoft AD password hash isn't a supported password
hash in FDS (or any other directory server, except AD of course). I
think this is because Microsoft's hash is proprietary. This means
neither SSHA or crypt can directly be synced with AD.
To sync passwords, you have to us
Jón Björn Njálsson wrote:
Is there any way to sync FDS crypt passwords with Active Directory or do
they have to be encrypted with SSHA ?
Winsync doesn't care what hash type you use. It hooks the
plaintext password (on both ends) and sends that (via an SSL
protected session, of course).
--
Rich Megginson wrote:
> Scott Boggs wrote:
>
>> I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very
>> impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with
>> the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is
>> best to keep with the current s
