RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Exporting MD5 Hash from FD-DS into/etc/shadow

El mié, 19-04-2006 a las 16:12 -0400, DeMarco, Dennis escribió: > I had some time to play with this. I do not believe it can be done > easily unless another password storage mechanism is made as a plug-in. > > The GNU-MD5 password format for /etc/shadow I believe is: > > $1$, followed by an 8 ch

[Fedora-directory-users] SSL directory server gateway

Hi all, I'm pretty uncertain about the best way to go about configuring the admin server to use SSL (FDS1.0.2) . All of the docs I'm finding are pretty shaky. Ultimately, I want users to manage their passwords and info via the web-based Directory Server Gateway over SSL. This would appear t

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Exporting MD5 Hash from FD-DS into/etc/shadow

I had some time to play with this. I do not believe it can be done easily unless another password storage mechanism is made as a plug-in. The GNU-MD5 password format for /etc/shadow I believe is: $1$, followed by an 8 character salt, $, 22 character hash. Seems like something that could be very

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Exporting MD5 Hash from FD-DS into /etc/shadow

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:14:31 +0300 From: Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to export the MD5 hash from the Fedora directory user's password attribute into /etc/shadow of a Linux machine not in LDAP (Redhat). It appears this

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

For some reason, I just assumed that they would be unsigned integers. That would make more sense to me too... since uid numbers can't be negative (as far as I know)? oh well :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6231.shtm Aha, they are stored as signed integers, s

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6231.shtm Aha, they are stored as signed integers, so the actual number is in the 2 billion range... For some reason, I just assumed that they would be unsigned integers. Thanks for the pointer! -- mike -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directo

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6231.shtm I think Solaris also supports 32-bit uids, not sure about other OSes. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if there is an upper limit on the uid or the gidNumber in fds. Or is there a limit on OS level? Does anyone know what it is? Is this diffe

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

I was wondering if there is an upper limit on the uid or the gidNumber in fds. Or is there a limit on OS level? Does anyone know what it is? Is this different between the RedHat releases? Is it different from other Unixes? I have personally loaded 10 million user accounts into FDS as a performan

[Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

Hello,I was wondering if there is an upper limit on the uid or the gidNumber in fds.Or is there a limit on OS level? Does anyone know what it is? Is this different between the RedHat releases?Is it different from other Unixes? Thanks in advance,Jo -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-direc

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Fedora Directory Server 7.1 with CentOS 4.2

Hariharan R wrote: Thanks for your reply. As Jim summers said, i am running all the server instances as a same user(root).But still i am not able to run my admin server.When i try to run it it shows the following "server is ready to accept requests at 1800" suddenly the process get detatch

[Fedora-directory-users] Fedora Directory Server 7.1 with CentOS 4.2

Thanks for your reply. As Jim summers said, i am running all the server instances as a same user(root).But still i am not able to run my admin server.When i try to run it it shows the following "server is ready to accept requests at 1800" suddenly the process get detatched.There is no proce

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Fedora Directory Server 7.1 with CentOS 4.2

Jim Summers wrote: Hariharan R wrote: Hai, I am trying to install Fedora DS 7.1 on CentOS4.2. At the End of the installation,the Admin server is not able to run. After starting the console i tried to login using admin ID but i am getting error like "URL not found or server not running"