Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Directory sync with Windows 2003 Server x64

2007-01-05 Thread David Boreham
Richard Hesse wrote: I'm guessing the problem is along those lines. The installer MSI puts the files in the correct locations for 32-bit binaries [syswow64 and program files (x86)]. Everything appears kosher along those lines, but it's just not working. My fear is that Windows will only let a 64

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Directory sync with Windows 2003 Server x64

2007-01-05 Thread Richard Hesse
I'm guessing the problem is along those lines. The installer MSI puts the files in the correct locations for 32-bit binaries [syswow64 and program files (x86)]. Everything appears kosher along those lines, but it's just not working. My fear is that Windows will only let a 64-bit DLL hook password c

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Directory sync with Windows 2003 Server x64

2007-01-05 Thread David Boreham
Richard Hesse wrote: Has anyone had any luck getting Windows 2003 Server x64 edition to sync with FDS? FDS will successfully pull down new objects from AD, but the passwords are not synchronized. Also, it appears that passhook.dll isn't functioning. The logfile indicates perpetual waiting for an

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Windows Sync Errors

2007-01-05 Thread David Boreham
Patrick Morris wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Glenn wrote: So if I have some object classes and attributes required for AD that are not allowed in DS, and vice-versa, how can I make Windows Sync work? I'm sure I'm missing something here. I'm including sample ldif entries from each import b

[Fedora-directory-users] Directory sync with Windows 2003 Server x64

2007-01-05 Thread Richard Hesse
Has anyone had any luck getting Windows 2003 Server x64 edition to sync with FDS? FDS will successfully pull down new objects from AD, but the passwords are not synchronized. Also, it appears that passhook.dll isn't functioning. The logfile indicates perpetual waiting for an event. It doesn't catch

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Windows Sync Errors

2007-01-05 Thread Patrick Morris
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Glenn wrote: > > So if I have some object classes and attributes required for AD that > > are not allowed in DS, and vice-versa, how can I make Windows Sync > > work? I'm sure I'm missing something here. I'm including sample > > ldif entries from each import below. Thank

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Windows Sync Errors

2007-01-05 Thread Glenn
Anybody? Thanks. -G. -- Original Message --- From: "Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Sent: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:38:50 -0600 Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Windows Sync Errors > O.K., so I'm guessing there

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Virtual Views entries only as leaves?

2007-01-05 Thread Pete Rowley
Ewen Cumming wrote: dc=root - ou=view - - ou=group - - - ou=subgroup - - - - o=org1 - - - - o=org2 - - - o=org3 - ou=entries - - o=org1 - - o=org2 - - o=org3 In the virtual view ou=group contains both ou=subgroup (with it's own virtual entries org1&2) and a virtual entry (org3) of its own. At t

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] FDS, SNMP & Cacti...

2007-01-05 Thread HAWKER, Dan
> If anyone wants my ready FDS-ified cacti templates, send me an email and > I'll forward it on. (or is there a special accessories area on the wiki I > can upload it to???). > >Just send me the files and I'll put them in the download area of the >wiki. Would you be interested in creating a

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] FDS, SNMP & Cacti...

2007-01-05 Thread Richard Megginson
HAWKER, Dan wrote: ...snip... Well, am glad to report success :) Wandered across both an OpenLDAP response[1] and a SunOneDS[2], Cacti template for use in monitoring an FDS box. Works nicely. The generic one shows how quick it responds, the SunOne template shows you more specific stats (binds, s

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] FDS, SNMP & Cacti...

2007-01-05 Thread HAWKER, Dan
> > > > > >Have had a quick surf and there are couple of OpenLDAP and > SunOne DS > > >templates out there I can use as a starting point, but nothing > > >specifically for FDS. > > > > > > > > The SunOne template should work, since the SNMP MIB is identical. > > > > Thanks for the info Dave.