Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-17 Thread Rich Megginson
Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 12/12/2009 12:06 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 12/07/2009 05:18 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelic wrote: Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from bac

Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-16 Thread Mitja Mihelič
On 12/12/2009 12:06 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 12/07/2009 05:18 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelic wrote: Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from backup. While the second

Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-11 Thread Rich Megginson
Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 12/07/2009 05:18 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelic wrote: Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from backup. While the second master was down, the first was receiving updates.

Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-11 Thread Mitja Mihelič
On 12/07/2009 05:18 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Mitja Mihelic wrote: Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from backup. While the second master was down, the first was receiving updates. After we fired up the

Re: [389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-07 Thread Rich Megginson
Mitja Mihelic wrote: Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from backup. While the second master was down, the first was receiving updates. After we fired up the restored master it started receiving updates as

[389-users] Multimaster replication out of sync

2009-12-07 Thread
Hi! We have two instances of the DS in a multimaster replication setup. We had to restore the database of one of the servers from backup. While the second master was down, the first was receiving updates. After we fired up the restored master it started receiving updates as soon as a change occurr