redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Configuration Directory Question
>
> James Deuchar wrote:
> > Thanks for the swift response - size depends on the success of the
> > project - am tempted to go with external config directory assuming I
> > can get it working...
: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:03:28 -0600> From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> To: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com> Subject: Re:
[Fedora-directory-users] Configuration Directory Question> > James Deuchar
wrote:> > Thanks for the swift response - size depends on the success of the >
that master01 is using dsconfig to stores is configuration
data?
Thanks again
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:33:37 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Configuration Directory Question
>
> James Deuchar wrote:
&g
600> From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> To: fedora-directory-users@redhat.com> Subject: Re:
[Fedora-directory-users] Configuration Directory Question> > James Deuchar
wrote:> > Hi,> >> > I've got a what I thought was a relatively simple DS setup
with two &g
James Deuchar wrote:
Hi,
I've got a what I thought was a relatively simple DS setup with two
master DS servers doing master-master replication. In the future
slaves may be added into the equation.
Initially I installed both servers the same - as standalone DS' each
with it's own admin serve
Hi,I've got a what I thought was a relatively simple DS setup with two master
DS servers doing master-master replication. In the future slaves may be added
into the equation.Initially I installed both servers the same - as standalone
DS' each with it's own admin server and 'in-house' o=Nets
