Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2008-12-19 04:32:47 EDT ---
openoffice.org-2.4.2-18.3.fc9 has been submitted as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477058
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: vte has broken backward compatibility without changing the interface
number
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477213
Summary: vte has broken backward
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477213
Behdad Esfahbod changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477213
Behdad Esfahbod changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Author: tibbs
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32547
Modified Files:
mgopen-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Dec 19 2008 Jason L Tibbitts III - 0.20050515-8
- It was decided that the license for these fonts is sufficiently d
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13901/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.12
Index: .cvsignore
===
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477058
--- Comment #2 from John Curcio 2008-12-19 20:10:29
EDT ---
Your attitude SUCKS! Rather than trying to assist me in furthe
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
This is a full rebuild, using systems running rawhide as of 12/17 to
rebuild all packages in rawhide on 12/17.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
Total packages: 6658
Number failed to build: 411
Number expected to fai
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386
This is a full rebuild, using systems running rawhide as of 12/17 to
rebuild all packages in rawhide on 12/17.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
Total packages: 6659
Number failed to build: 377
Number expected to fail
11 matches
Mail list logo