[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-03-05 04:44:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) ok, so

rpms/lohit-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 lohit-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 sources, 1.9, 1.10

Author: rbhalera Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19490 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-fonts.spec sources Log Message: New bugfixed version: lohit-fonts-2.3.8 Index: .cvsignore

[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 450699] [ta_IN] Errors in sh and shrI in Lohit Tamil font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483530] [bn_IN] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479238] please update to latest release (20090104)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #5 from Michael mcl...@gmail.com 2009-03-05 15:14:11 EDT --- I mean Shift and Alt work with the mouse but not

[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state. Bug 477416 Summary: [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-05 15:13:58 EDT --- We're getting there :) 1. you

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-05 15:53:44 EDT --- Better? SPEC:

[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com 2009-03-05 16:58:47 EDT --- Sorry I didn't respond, I

[Bug 479238] please update to latest release (freefont-ttf-20090104)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-05 19:12:09 EDT --- *** Bug 479238 has been marked as a