[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:39:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344557) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 501424] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error r

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:41:35 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11.fc12 to be clear. (The conflic

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:40:37 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC1" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0B

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:40:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344558) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501422] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error r

[Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 XinSun changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:36:30 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC2" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0B

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:35:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:37:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:29:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:28:51 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC1" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0B

[Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:26:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501420] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error r

[Bug 501418] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501418 XinSun changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 501418] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501418 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error r

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.36,1.37

2009-05-18 Thread Jens Petersen
Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10466 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: remove redundant obsoletes, provides and conflicts from new subpackages Index: liberation-fonts.spec

[Bug 501417] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501417 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result.

[Bug 501416] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:03:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501416] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:03:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 501416] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error resul

[Bug 501414] [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501414 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 22:49:51 EDT --- [kn_IN][GPOS]: U+0C95 U+0CC4 ಕೄ U+0C97 U+0CC4 ಗೄ U+0C9C U+0CC4 ಜ

[Bug 501414] New: [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501414 Summary: [kn_IN]Curs

[Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #27 from XinSun 2009-05-18 22:33:09 EDT --- [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CBE ಾ U+0CBF ಿ U+0CC0 ೀ U+0CC1 ು U+0CC2

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #188 from philippe 2009-05-18 17:21:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #187) > The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some > point > fai

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #187 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2009-05-18 09:01:14 PDT --- The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point fairly recently. Can s

[Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-18 08:00:02 EDT --- Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If yo

[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing

2009-05-18 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 + 2009 --- Childworkspace "otf01" looks good for a OOo 3.2 target.

[Bug 501277] [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 07:00:19 EDT --- [pa_IN][CodePoint] U+0A36 ਸ਼ U+0A59 ਖ਼ U+0A5A ਗ਼ U+0A5B ਜ਼ U+0A5E ਫ਼ have

[Bug 501277] New: [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 Summary: [Indic][CodePoin

[Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 XinSun changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 501271] New: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501271 Summary: [Indic][

[Bug 501271] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501271 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 06:31:43 EDT --- [ka-IN][GPOS] U+0C97 U+0CCB ಗೋ U+0C9C U+0CCB ಜೋ U+0C9F U+0CCB ಟೋ U+0

[Bug 501267] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 06:24:14 EDT --- [kn_IN][GPOS]: the follows have the same problem. U+0C95 U+0CC7 ಕೇ U

[Bug 501267] New: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char.

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 Summary: [Indic]

[Bug 500971] [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500971 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 05:58:37 EDT --- [pa_IN][GSUB] U+0A33 U+0A4D U+0A2F ਲ਼੍ਯ U+0A36 U+0A4D U+0A2F ਸ਼੍ਯ U+0