Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
WulfTheSaxon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #190 from Patrick Garies 2009-06-19 21:32:30
PDT ---
@Comment #189:
I would hope that Mozilla doesn't follow the Safari approach. It's very bad
when you're on dial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262
--- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-06-19 14:53:46 EDT ---
The freetype thing is a red herring, FindGlyphRef doesn't call
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #189 from Ian Kennedy 2009-06-19
05:00:47 PDT ---
If you are downloading a font via @font-face Firefox will first render the text
with a standard font before downl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-19 06:11:59 EDT ---
japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been subm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-19 06:12:04 EDT ---
japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been subm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-19
03:47:46 EDT ---
Actually, this kind of symlink does not belong in the fon