http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22393
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394
Summary: Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata
Product: DejaVu
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please update font links and deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507129
Summary: Please update font links and deps
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please update font links and deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131
Summary: Please update font links and deps
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please update font links and deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507132
Summary: Please update font links and deps
Product: Fedora
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12517/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.22
Index: .cvsignore
===
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should handle TTC files properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507144
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should handle TTC files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should check fontconfig files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507145
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should check fontconfig fi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should test all the Opentype ID fields
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507146
Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should test all t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21
05:48:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I can't find any other VeraBd.t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-21 06:57:30 EDT ---
pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21
15:29:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> 1. the prefix for Open Font LiB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21
15:29:14 EDT ---
1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477450, which changed state.
Bug 477450 Summary: [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646
--- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-21 22:23:33
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> IIRC the conflicts are needed t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and
IPA fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
Summary: Package building str
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
--- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-21 23:56:58
EDT ---
But upstream calls these four fonts as "IPA font" and th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-22 00:21:50 EDT ---
>From the definition of font family in our policy
http://fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646
--- Comment #25 from seth vidal 2009-06-22 00:27:39 EDT ---
1. did the package get renamed? If so - then there needs to be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
--- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-22 02:07:09
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Hmm, I can now see both "4 fon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22
02:27:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Number 1 of "Package layout fo
31 matches
Mail list logo
