[Bug 497090] [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong.

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 507637] Missing fontset info

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-28 20:04:09 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13

2009-06-28 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24261 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: used upstream provided fonts.{dir,scale} Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec ==

[Bug 507637] Missing fontset info

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-28 19:34:30 EDT --- I am thinking if I should apply for making cjkuni-font

[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-28 15:21:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > So you're saying that even wi