[Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 523167] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm"

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm"

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Bug 501424 depends on bug 524457, which changed state. Bug 524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm"

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Bug 501422 depends on bug 524457, which changed state. Bug 524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:33:15 EDT --- >From Comment #6, Correct behaviour of following combina