[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 23:43:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Then someone noticed the spec d

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 22:08:39 EDT --- (I am reminded of a good apt phrase: "Do what we document,

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 22:02:25 EDT --- Well I already removed the conflicts so it is more a case o

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #27 from seth vidal 2009-06-22 08:23:15 EDT --- Nicolas: was there a package in common use or in fedora that wa

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 03:50:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > 1. did the package get rename

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #25 from seth vidal 2009-06-22 00:27:39 EDT --- 1. did the package get renamed? If so - then there needs to be

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-21 22:23:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > IIRC the conflicts are needed t

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-19 04:39:36 EDT --- IIRC the conflicts are needed to help yum in some obscure

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:41:35 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11.fc12 to be clear. (The conflic

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 05:23:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > >

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-13 04:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > 1. What are you saying? I co

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 03:51:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-13 03:39:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) >

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 03:02:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343714) --> (https://bugzilla.re

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-13 00:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > No, you don't need that since i

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-12 15:52:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > So let's fix this properly: >

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 12:23:10 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Re

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-10 12:10:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > No. upgrading path from F-10 -

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-08 23:42:52 EDT --- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/us

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 17:37:33 EDT --- ping? Spec file seems to contain some unnecessary stuff as

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 03:13:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The liberation-fonts provides doe

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --