[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-22 03:50:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) 1.

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #27 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 08:23:15 EDT --- Nicolas: was there a package in common use or

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 22:02:25 EDT --- Well I already removed the conflicts so

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 22:08:39 EDT --- (I am reminded of a good apt phrase: Do

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 23:43:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) Then someone

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-21 22:23:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) IIRC the

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #25 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 00:27:39 EDT --- 1. did the package get renamed? If so - then

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-19 04:39:36 EDT --- IIRC the conflicts are needed

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-18 23:41:35 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11.fc12 to be

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-13 03:02:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343714) --

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-13 03:39:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13)

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-13 03:51:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-13 04:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17)

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-13 05:23:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) (In reply

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-12 15:52:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) So let's

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-13 00:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) No, you

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-10 12:10:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) No.

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-10 12:23:10 EDT ---

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 23:42:52 EDT --- ping! -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-05-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-27 03:13:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) The

[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added