[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 nh2 nh2-redhatbugzi...@deditus.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #30 from nh2 nh2-redhatbugzi...@deditus.de 2009-11-03 08:05:14 EDT --- Sorry, a typo. The URL is

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 10:41:08 EDT --- Jim Hayward reports on

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #23 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2009-10-28 11:28:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Ben, do you have any

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 14:30:30 EDT --- I *finally* got rawhide x86_64

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #25 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-10-28 14:44:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) I *finally*

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #26 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2009-10-28 14:55:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) I *finally* got

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #27 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 14:58:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) (In reply

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #28 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-28 15:41:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) (In reply

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-10-27 16:47:26 EDT --- For information, upstream and Ubuntu