Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-05 Thread Caius Carlos Chance
Hi, This is Caius Chance who is the package maintainer from Red Hat. I am writing for the recent updates of Liberation Fonts: - The latest stable version is liberation-fonts-1.03-1.fc9 <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=45785> . - The font tarball had been hos

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-06 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mardi 06 mai 2008 à 16:54 +1000, Caius Carlos Chance a écrit : > Hi, Hi, > This is Caius Chance who is the package maintainer from Red Hat. I am > writing for the recent updates of Liberation Fonts: Thank you for posting this. Many people have complained in the past of the L

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-06 Thread Caius Carlos Chance
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Thank you for posting this. Many people have complained in the past of the Liberation communication blackhole. I hope this period will soon be behind us, and you'll get an active community interface. You are welcome. It was also a communication blackhole be

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-07 Thread Denis Jacquerye
2008/5/7 Caius Carlos Chance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Nicolas, > > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > Thank you for posting this. Many people have complained in the past of > > the Liberation communication blackhole. I hope this period will soon be > > behind us, and you'll get an active communit

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-07 Thread Caius Carlos Chance
Hi Denis, At the moment please send to this mailing list. We are still looking for a liberation-fonts exclusive one. :) Best Regards, Caius. Denis Jacquerye wrote: 2008/5/7 Caius Carlos Chance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Thank you for posting this. M

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 09:40 +1000, Caius Carlos Chance a écrit : > Hi Denis, Hi Caius, > At the moment please send to this mailing list. We are still looking for > a liberation-fonts exclusive one. :) You're welcome to use this list as long as you want. It's not as if it's high traffic and ev

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-08 Thread Caius Carlos Chance
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: You're welcome to use this list as long as you want. It's not as if it's high traffic and everyone on it should be interested in Liberation progress anyway. I have emailed to admin of this mailing list server for a new mailing list, but anyways we could still discuss

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-11 Thread Qianqian Fang
/wiki/Liberation_fonts#License_controversy [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg36584.html Caius Carlos Chance wrote: Hi, This is Caius Chance who is the package maintainer from Red Hat. I am writing for the recent updates of Liberation Fonts: - The latest stable version is liberation-

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-13 Thread Jens Petersen
You're welcome to use this list as long as you want. It's not as if it's high traffic and everyone on it should be interested in Liberation progress anyway. In fact your posting there made me wonder if we shouldn't repurpose this list in a Lohit+Liberation+Fonts SIG one. Certainly sharing an IRC

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-14 Thread Nicolas Spalinger
> At the moment please send to this mailing list. We are still looking for > a liberation-fonts exclusive one. :) Hi everyone, It's good to see the development process of Liberation opening up :-) During the last LGM where we talked about fonts and related topics I thought I'll clone the Liberat

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-17 Thread Dave Crossland
2008/5/9 Caius Carlos Chance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> You're welcome to use this list as long as you want. It's not as if it's >> high traffic and everyone on it should be interested in Liberation >> progress anyway. > > I have emailed to admin of this mailing list server

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 14 mai 2008 02:45, Jens Petersen a écrit : >> You're welcome to use this list as long as you want. It's not as if >> it's >> high traffic and everyone on it should be interested in Liberation >> progress anyway. >> >> In fact your posting there made me wonder if we shouldn't repurpose >> th

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-20 Thread Jens Petersen
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: I've looked at the old lohit-devel list and it's really low traffic, with Rahul Bhalerao accounting for more than 3/4th of the messages. So I guess it's up to Rahul to decide if moving to a common font list is worth it for lohit. Right Personally I feel a list with almo

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-20 Thread Dave Crossland
2008/5/20 Jens Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My initial concern was if non-Fedora people would be put off from > subscribing to a Fedora specific fonts list. As someone very new to the Fedora community, I think a Fedora-specific general-purpose-fonts list is much more enticing than a Fedora-sp

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-20 Thread Caius Carlos Chance
Hi Dave, Alright. Thanks a lot for your info. Anyways, no mailing list admin was processing my request so no mailing list was ever created. Best Regards, Caius. Dave Crossland 提到: 2008/5/9 Caius Carlos Chance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Nicolas Mailhot wrote: You're welcome to use this l

Re: Updates of liberation-fonts.

2008-05-20 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:13:37 +0800 Jens Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess you're right, since we stopped "spamming" this list with > bugzilla mail it is low traffic, so maybe it is ok for non-fedora > people to subscribe to. My initial concern was if non-Fedora people > would be put

Re: [Openfontlibrary] [Fwd: Updates of liberation-fonts.]

2008-05-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mercredi 07 mai 2008 à 15:07 -0300, Gustavo Ferreira a écrit : > hello, > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=45785 > > reading the changelog in the link above, it seems like there were > only small changes in some metainfo fields, and no changes in the > design (exce