On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 20:36 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
>
> > One thing that has really bothered me lately about SVN is the lack of
> > merge tracking.
>
> It's coming -- either in 1.5 or 1.6.
>
> Until then, svnmerge.py is a very good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 11, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
One thing that has really bothered me lately about SVN is the lack of
merge tracking.
It's coming -- either in 1.5 or 1.6.
Until then, svnmerge.py is a very good add-on for managing branches,
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
> CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
> distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our
> infrastructure.
>
> /me
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 22:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
> CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
> distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our
> infrastructure.
>
> /me
Yeah, get rid of CVS, in fact, s/CVS/SVN/g ...
Cheers,
Timo
On So, Mär 11, 2007 at 10:02:16 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
> CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
> distributed SCM would have mor
Once upon a time Sunday 11 March 2007, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
> CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
> distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our
> infrastructure.
>
> /me
I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use
CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a
distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our
infrastructure.
/me doesn't care, but does generally dislike cvs.
-Mike
Mike McGrath wrote:
Dan is requesting a xen instance for use for this project.
Questions I have:
There's no way to integrate this into our current environment? All
information we get from the internet is random data :-)
Can you give us a better idea of how this works on the back end? What
Toshio Kuratomi schrieb:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 16:47 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Oliver Falk schrieb:
>>> Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
Users of i386 and x86_64 that update daily would have had two package
updates without any benefit for them :-( I'd like to aoid that if easily
>>>
