starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance. What do you
guys think?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
git:
+1
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty
Oliver Falk wrote:
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure
Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the
packages) so it replaces what is now in:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora
Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for both together and settle
down on one SCM instead?
Rahul
On 07/02/2007 04:37 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Oliver Falk wrote:
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:10:17PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the
packages) so it replaces what is now in:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora
Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for
Same as me, any is good.
As Seth git is alphabetically first so +1 git
On 7/2/07, Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with
either git or mercurial. Can I
On 7/2/07, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:50:39 Axel Thimm wrote:
+1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac,
and it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when
something comes up we'd be able to attack it
On Monday 02 July 2007 14:16:49 Axel Thimm wrote:
In the trac camp there's love for mercurial but not for git, don't ask
me why. Also when 0.10 hit the streets mercurial support for it was
working and managable, while git was in experimental planning stage.
But don't rust me, just look at the
I would like to remind everyone to vote in the Fedora Board elections,
which are currently ongoing. If you are getting this message multiple
times, I'm sorry. It's being sent to various lists.
The Fedora Board's membership changes on a rotating basis. This
election is for 3 of the 9 Fedora
Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left
with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the
people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in
Infrastructure
15 matches
Mail list logo