Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Mike McGrath
starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance. What do you guys think?

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Florian La Roche
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: git: +1 Jeff signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Oliver Falk
On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure are really pretty

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Mike McGrath
Oliver Falk wrote: On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Mike McGrath wrote: Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the packages) so it replaces what is now in: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for both together and settle down on one SCM instead? Rahul

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Oliver Falk
On 07/02/2007 04:37 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: Oliver Falk wrote: On 07/02/2007 04:13 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:10:17PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: Actually this SCM is just for our infrastructure stuff (not the packages) so it replaces what is now in: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/?root=fedora Wouldn't it be better to make the decision for

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Paulo Santos
Same as me, any is good. As Seth git is alphabetically first so +1 git On 7/2/07, Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 7/2/07, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure are really pretty

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: On Monday 02 July 2007 10:50:39 Axel Thimm wrote: +1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac, and it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when something comes up we'd be able to attack it

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Monday 02 July 2007 14:16:49 Axel Thimm wrote: In the trac camp there's love for mercurial but not for git, don't ask me why. Also when 0.10 hit the streets mercurial support for it was working and managable, while git was in experimental planning stage. But don't rust me, just look at the

Reminder -- Vote in the Fedora Board election

2007-07-02 Thread Max Spevack
I would like to remind everyone to vote in the Fedora Board elections, which are currently ongoing. If you are getting this message multiple times, I'm sorry. It's being sent to various lists. The Fedora Board's membership changes on a rotating basis. This election is for 3 of the 9 Fedora

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Nigel Jones
Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.

Re: Infrastructure SCM

2007-07-02 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in Infrastructure