Mike McGrath wrote:
> collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
> Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
>
> 1) gobby (its AMAZING)
> 2) pastebin or something like it (also amazing)
I'd also suggest to consider http://paste.snow-crash.org/ i
On Jan 30, 2008 8:39 PM, Luke Macken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stickum[0] has been pretty nice so far in my experience. My only beef with
> http://f3dora.org so far has been the fact that sometimes it's quite
> slow.
Jonathan can step in with more details, but the f3dora.org slowness is
a hard
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:15:22PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
> Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
>
> 1) gobby (its AMAZING)
> 2) pastebin or something like it (also amazing)
> 3) mailman.
>
>
Alright team, now that we're able to vacuum all of our postgres tables
no matter how big, it's time for us to setup a plan for vacuuming all of
our tables on a regular basis. That way when we do get a chance to
perform a vacuum full on the tables they won't fill back up with dead
tuples and al
Kostas Georgiou wrote:
You can also change it for a user or a database with:
ALTER DATABASE koji SET maintenance_work_mem TO 1048576;
ALTER USER koji SET maintenance_work_mem TO 1048576;
The per session setting should be enough though if you
only need the extra memory for the vacuum.
Thanks Ko
On Jan 30, 2008 2:23 PM, Jeffrey Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/30/08, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 3) mailman.
>
> I've some experience with mailman, so I could work on that...
>
Me too. I can help with this.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
With whatever solution we find, I'd be willing to look at setting up a
"livesearch" like interface:
In plone:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/CMFPlone/branches/3.0/skins/plone_scripts/livesearch_reply.py
feeds:
Mike,
For pastebin, we have been testing with stickum. Upstream at
http://code.google.com/p/stickum/ (maybe we could talk with the project
owner to move it to fedorahosted, since it would have more visibility and
more development?!)
We currently have 3 of our own well know colleagues (abadger, ric
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
> > Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
> >
> > 1) gobby (its AMAZING)
>
> Yes, it is (though it needs transaction support so
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Dale Bewley wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:43 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:
> > > why these machines can't run fedora 8 ?
> > > fedora 8 have new xen version, and new xen kernels.
> > >
> > Fedora 8 is ill suited to this par
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
> collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
> Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
>
> 1) gobby (its AMAZING)
> 2) pastebin or something like it (also amazing)
> 3) mailman.
>
> So who wants to set
Mike McGrath wrote:
> collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
> Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
>
> 1) gobby (its AMAZING)
Yes, it is (though it needs transaction support so "undo" can save a mis
-edit). Fedora Unity has been using
On 1/30/08, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3) mailman.
I've some experience with mailman, so I could work on that...
Jeff
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/list
collab1.fedoraproject.org is up and running. Yahoo! So whats missing?
Well, it doesn't actually do anything yet. Plans for it include
1) gobby (its AMAZING)
2) pastebin or something like it (also amazing)
3) mailman.
So who wants to set up what? Luke, you'd mentioned you might be able to
get
2008/1/30 Dale Bewley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do you mean Fedora in general since this box is seen as a rarely touched
> appliance and you don't want to upgrade it often?
Generally for this reason. Frequent upgrades are rough in an
environment that is supposed to be up most of the time. Especiall
Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Jonathan Steffan wrote:
>> I have. I'd recommend using datapark search[1]. There is also the
>> xapian[2] but it will need a robot to do the crawling (it has the Omega
>> indexer, but that is designed for local data.) I've got some python code
>> started, but it's not re
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:43 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:
> > why these machines can't run fedora 8 ?
> > fedora 8 have new xen version, and new xen kernels.
> >
> Fedora 8 is ill suited to this particular task which, in reality, is just
> an appliance/
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:34 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> > >
> > > 1) Do we run our own?
> > >
> > > 2) Do we use goog
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:21 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> >
> > 1) Do we run our own?
> >
> > 2) Do we use google.
> >
> > I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. S
Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> I have. I'd recommend using datapark search[1]. There is also the
> xapian[2] but it will need a robot to do the crawling (it has the Omega
> indexer, but that is designed for local data.) I've got some python code
> started, but it's not ready for production. htdig can be
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
1) Do we run our own?
Definitely.
2) Do we use google.
No, I think it should be OSS.
At OSU our web group uses Nutch with pretty good results. And you
don't have to use the
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
> >
> > 1) Do we run our own?
> >
> > 2) Do we use google.
> >
> > I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are moral
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:57:23AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
>
> 2) Do we use google.
>
> I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are moral issues at
> stake here. (though I've not used google
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McGrath wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
I 110% recommend running our own.
> 2) Do we use google.
I'd like to not.
>
> I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are mo
I use Lucene, and works pretty well. But its written in Java
Paulo
On Jan 30, 2008 5:57 PM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
>
> 1) Do we run our own?
>
> 2) Do we use google.
>
> I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS.
We need a Fedora search engine. Especially for docs. Options
1) Do we run our own?
2) Do we use google.
I love 2, its easy. But it is, non-OSS. So there are moral issues at
stake here. (though I've not used google to exclusively search through
our sites, it may suck at it, who knows :)
So,
26 matches
Mail list logo
