On 2008-04-10 03:17:23 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> To follow up on this. Im going to be looking at dogtag first. Ive had a
> promise from them to help us when we have issues.
>
> OpenCA seems to have stalled development wise.
>
> ejbca has a very heavy footprint.
>
> something Custom i think
15:00 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure --
Who's here?
15:01 * yingbull is.
15:01 < mmcgrath> Alrighty everyone, who's around?
15:01 * warren here
15:01 * skvidal is here
15:01 * notting is here
15:01 < mmcgrath> jcollie: you around?
15:02 < jcollie> yup
15:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:17 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > We have come to the realisation that this has to be done sooner rather than
> > later. So i'm putting out a call for help and for feedback.
> >
> > We need to revamp the CA infrastructur
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:17 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> To follow up on this. Im going to be looking at dogtag first. Ive had a
> promise from them to help us when we have issues.
>
> OpenCA seems to have stalled development wise.
>
> ejbca has a very heavy footprint.
>
> something Custo
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> We have come to the realisation that this has to be done sooner rather than
> later. So i'm putting out a call for help and for feedback.
>
> We need to revamp the CA infrastructure used in Fedora.
>
> This is where Id like to see us go.
>
> Publis
